Bethel Health Care Center
Bethel, Connecticut · CCN 075400
20 surveys since 2010, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 134
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 161
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES
- County
- Western Ct
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 62 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Connecticut.
Last survey on record
Jul 22, 2025
475 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.22 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.76 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.9% | 35.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $16,036 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G26.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2580.6% | E412.9% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5782×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Bethel Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF656May 10, 2024
Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to follow the plan of care when obtaining the resident's weight, Resident #1 sustained a foot laceration that required hospitalization as a result. The finding includes: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included type one diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had intact cognition, severely impaired vision, and required assistance with transfers. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 10, 2024
Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #6), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident's wheelchair cushion was secured to the wheelchair and as a result, the resident fell and sustained an injury. The finding includes: Resident #6 had diagnoses that included dementia, atrial fibrillation and heart failure (on blood thinner). The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance for locomotion in a wheelchair. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Jul 22, 2025
Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #8, 60 and 117) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure signs that included personal and health information, were not posted and visible in the residents' room. The findings include:1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in January 2022 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, and muscle weakness. A dysphagia evaluation report dated 11/14/24 identified Resident #8 was being evaluated for life limiting or threatening dysphagia with feeding difficulties and coughing with the purpose of the evaluation to determine the least restrictive diet and appropriate swallowing maneuvers and strategies. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Oct 29, 2024
Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who was a recent admission and reviewed for omission of medication, the facility failed to notify the provider or implement proper procedures to authorize payment for a medication that was not covered by the resident's insurance to prevent the omission of a medication for forty-eight (48) days. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included prostate cancer, quadriplegia, and chronic congestive heart failure. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had no memory recall deficits, was alert and oriented to person, place and time, and was dependent on staff for all daily living skills. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Sep 6, 2023
Based on tour of the kitchen and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Dietary Department was maintained in a manner that food items were consistently labeled and stored to reflect their age or shelf-life. The findings included. Tour of the Dietary Department on [DATE] at 11:02 AM during the initial walk-through of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM) identified the following: a. In the dry storage area, 1 bag of pasta was observed to be in the original packaging, was opened, but did not include a date when opened or an expiration date. b. […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 134 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 22, 2025Standard and complaint6 findings
- Oct 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
- May 10, 2024Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 6, 2023Standard20 findings
- Apr 11, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Aug 2, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Jul 21, 2021Standard7 findings
- May 20, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- May 8, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Apr 4, 2019Standard14 findings
- Feb 23, 2018Standard8 findings
- Mar 17, 2017Standard and complaint8 findings
- May 26, 2016Standard and complaint11 findings
- Aug 20, 2015Standard and complaint13 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 6, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 2, 2014—7 findings
- Sep 25, 2013—4 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 25, 2013—3 findings
- Dec 15, 2011—12 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 15, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction