Deficiency Index

Autumn Lake Healthcare at Norwalk

Norwalk, Connecticut · CCN 075387

18 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
109
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
150
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
AUTUMN LAKE HEALTHCARE
County
Western Ct
Medicare-certified since
1993

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 62 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Connecticut.

Last survey on record

Mar 17, 2026

237 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.263.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.38—
Annual nurse turnover29.9%35.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$12,834 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3073.2%E1024.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B12.4%C—
CMS’s current file: 41 of the 109 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F8423×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F5612×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Autumn Lake Healthcare at Norwalk, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Mar 17, 2026

    Based on clinical record reviews, resident interviews, review of policy and staff interviews for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for choices (Residents #62 and #80), the facility failed to ensure residents were not restricted from an outdoor common area without an individualized assessment and failed to notify residents of rule changes. The findings included: 1.Resident #62's diagnoses included polyneuropathy (a painful nerve condition that affects several areas of the body at the same time) and insomnia.A physician's order dated 9/17/2025 directed Resident #62's ambulation status as independent using a two-wheeled walker on/off the unit and in the community for Leave of Absence) LOA.A quarterly activity review dated 1/23/2026 identified that some of Resident #62's favorite activities included… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF561Mar 17, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, facility documents, review of facility policy and interviews for 1 of 7 residents (Resident # 57) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure that the resident received scheduled showers as per resident preferences. The findings include: Resident #57's diagnoses included muscle weakness and difficulty walking.The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #57 as cognitively intact and was dependent for shower and bathing and required partial to moderate assistance for tub and shower transfers. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF726Mar 17, 2026

    Based on review of facility assessment, review of facility documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all Nurse Aide Resident Care competencies were completed for 2025. The findings include: The Facility Assessment Tool reviewed on 1/13/2026 indicated staff training/education and competencies( skill checks) are necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for the resident population. An interview and facility document review on 3/13/2026 at 11:23 AM with the ADNS, responsible for staff development in the facility identified the Nurse Aide Resident Care competencies (observations made to ensure a person can provide care to meet the needs of the residents) had been completed in 2024. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Mar 17, 2026

    Based on review of the clinical record review, observations, review of policy and staff interviews for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Communication ( Resident # 38), the facility failed to ensure normal saline syringes for flushing an Intravenous Therapy ( IV) line were stored appropriately and the facility failed to ensure saline flushes and IV supplies for resident use, stored in the medication rooms were labeled appropriately. The findings included: 1.Resident #38's diagnosis included Sepsis(an infection that had spread to the bloodstream).The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #38 was cognitively intact had an intravenous (IV) device and was receiving intravenous(IV)medication. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Mar 17, 2026

    Based on observation, facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 18 residents on Enhanced barrier precautions ( Resident #69),the facility did not ensure proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was readily available and for 5 of the 18 residents (Residents #5, #88, #121,#132 and #160) on enhanced Barrier precautions, the facility did not ensure trash receptacles were available to dispose of the used PPE prior to exiting the resident's rooms.The findings included: 1. Resident #69 's diagnoses included diverticulitis with perforation and ileostomy.During observations conducted on 3/9/26 from 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM, 3/10/26 from 8:30 AM to 12:30 PM, and 3/11/26 from 6:00 AM to 8:00 AM, surveyors observed multiple residents designated as requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).For… […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 109 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 17, 2026Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Mar 19, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 13, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 23, 2024Standard18 findings
  • Apr 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 23, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Jan 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • May 31, 2019Standard and complaint2 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Apr 17, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Apr 27, 2017Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 2, 2016Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • May 13, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 19, 2015Standard7 findings · 1 harm
  • May 1, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Jun 27, 2013—11 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 17, 2013—1 finding
  • Jul 30, 2012—19 findings · 3 harm
  • May 19, 2011—3 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction