Berkshire Place
Pittsfield, Massachusetts · CCN 225762
13 surveys since 2012, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 35
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 54
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Berkshire
- Medicare-certified since
- 2001
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 39 facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Feb 12, 2026
270 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.02 | 4.98 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.63 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 68.4% | 34.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G218.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D981.8% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Berkshire Place, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF580Aug 17, 2023
Based on record review and interviews for one resident (Resident #199) out of a total sample of 12 residents, the facility failed to notify the Attending Physician of a significant change in the Resident's medical status. Specifically, for Resident #199 the facility staff failed to contact the Physician when the Resident began to first exhibit signs and symptoms of a significant decline, resulting in a delayed transfer to the hospital. The Resident was diagnosed with sepsis and admitted to the Critical Care Unit when finally transferred to the hospital. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Aug 17, 2023
Based on record review and interviews for one Resident (#199) out of a total sample of 12 residents, the facility failed to ensure standards of quality of care were provided to the Resident. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Recognize a significant decline in the Resident's status and notify the Attending Physician timely resulting in delay in transferring the critically ill Resident to the hospital. 2. Appropriately document and monitor areas of concern on the Resident's skin which was ultimately diagnosed as a pressure injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 22, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to: 1. properly store perishables needing refrigeration in two of two facility kitchens (Unit 2 and Unit 3), 2. label and date open dry good items stored in two out of two facility kitchens (Unit 2 and Unit 3), 3. discard food that had been stored over three days in one out of two facility kitchens (Unit 3), 4. date opened food items in the refrigerator in two of two facility kitchens (Unit 2 and Unit 3), and 5. date opened food items in the freezer in one out of two facility kitchens (Unit 3). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF887Jun 6, 2023
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure its staff educated and offered COVID-19 vaccinations to four Residents (#1, #2, #3, and #4) out of a sample of five residents, to stop the spread of infection. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident/Patient COVID-19 Immunization, dated 10/2021, indicated the following: -Resident/patients of Berkshire Place will be offered immunization against COVID-19 as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . -The COVID-19 vaccine will be offered unless immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident/patient has already been immunized. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF886Apr 22, 2022
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure seven out of sixty staff members were tested in one specific week for the COVID-19 (a contagious respiratory illness) virus. Findings include: Review of the Department of Health (DPH) guidelines titled, Updates to Long Term Care Surveillance Testing, dated 9/24/2021, included, but was not limited to: -Surveillance Testing Program: Long term care facilities must conduct weekly testing of all staff. Review of the facility policy titled, Testing Policy related to COVID-19, dated 3/2022, included, but was not limited to: Weekly surveillance testing of all staff will be done in accordance with Department of Health (DPH) guidelines. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 35 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 12, 2026Standard2 findings
- Oct 28, 2024Standard3 findings
- Aug 17, 2023Standard6 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 6, 2023Infection control3 findings
- Apr 22, 2022Standard7 findings
- Nov 13, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Oct 3, 2019Standard2 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Jul 17, 2018Standard3 findings
- Jun 6, 2017Standard2 findings · 2 harm
- May 18, 2016Standard1 finding
- Feb 12, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 7, 2012—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction