Bayley Place

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bayley Place, in the surveyor’s own words.

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 21, 2025

  Based on observation, staff interview, policy review, and review of the 2022 United States Food and Drug Administration Food Code, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff wore appropriate hair (beard) covers while in the food preparation area. This had the potential to affect 104 of 104 residents who received meals from the kitchen, excluding Resident #1. The facility census was 105. Findings included: Observation on 08/11/25 at 11:16 A.M., during the initial tour, [NAME] #9 was observed in the food preparation area with long, facial hair that was approximately an inch in length, uncovered. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Aug 12, 2022

  Based on observation, staff interview, policy review, review of personal files, and review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) in a manner to prevent the potential spread of Covid-19. The facility identified six residents who had tested positive for COVID-19 in the past two weeks and four residents who were in isolation precautions for positive COVID-19 on the day of entrance. The facility failed to ensure newly hired employees had their first and second step [CONDITION(S)] skin test (PPD) as required. This affected two State tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) #95 and #170 out of five newly hired staff reviewed. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF609Aug 12, 2022

  Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure injuries of unknown origin were reported to the state agency for Resident #09, failed to ensure resident-to-resident altercations were reported to the state agency for Residents #18, #92, #26 and #146, and failed to ensure allegations of sexual abuse were reported to the state agency for Residents #18 and #65. This affected six Residents (#09, #18, #26, #65, #92, and #146) out of 32 reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 105. Findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF610Aug 12, 2022

  Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure injuries of unknown origin were investigated for Resident #09, failed to ensure resident-to-resident altercations were investigated for Residents #18, #92, #26, and #146, and failed to ensure allegations of sexual abuse were investigated for Resident #18 and #65. This affected six Residents (#09, #18, #26, #65, #92, and #146) out of 32 reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 105. Findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . He had an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 05/17/22. He had severe cognitive impairment. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Jul 23, 2026

  Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide dignified care for Resident #5 who had an indwelling Suprapubic catheter. This affected one (Resident #5) of four residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 107.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy, indwelling Suprapubic catheter and methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had intact cognition and was occasionally incontinent of bowel and had an indwelling Suprapubic catheter for the bladder. […]