Deficiency Index

Logan Acres

Bellefontaine, Ohio · CCN 365768

8 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
38
Surveys
8
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file6/8

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
110
Ownership
Government - County
Chain
Independent
County
Logan · rural
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 26, 2023

1,383 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG16.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1168.8%E318.8%F16.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 16 of the 38 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Logan Acres, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF644Jan 26, 2023

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) were accurately completed and updated. This affected four residents (#02, #21, #23, and #61) out of four residents reviewed. The facility census was 88. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #61 revealed an admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, dementia, bipolar disorder, and depression. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF610Jul 31, 2025

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to investigate bruising of unknown origin. This affected one (#72) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed admission date of 08/16/21. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia with behaviors, Alzheimer's Disease, essential thrombocythemia, depression and anxiety. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Jul 31, 2025

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans addressed the use of psychotropic medications. This affected three (#11, #56, and #83) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 104. Findings include:1.Review of Resident #83's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/17/24. Diagnoses included dementia, hypertension, aphasia, altered mental status, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/17/25, revealed Resident #83 had severe cognitive impairment. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Jul 31, 2025

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure skin assessments were completed per facility policy and further failed to ensure treatments for identified skin conditions were implemented timely. This affected two (#72 and #05) of three residents reviewed for non-pressure ulcer skin conditions. The facility census was 104.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 08/16/21. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia with behaviors, Alzheimer's disease, essential thrombocythemia, depression and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/20/25, revealed Resident #72) had severely impaired cognition. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF685Jul 31, 2025

    Based on observation, medical record review and family and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had physician ordered eyeglasses available for use. This affected one (#97) of one resident reviewed for vision care. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed an admission date of 01/03/22. Diagnoses included glaucoma and major depressive disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/08/25, revealed Resident #97 had severe cognitive impairment. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 38 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 31, 2025Standard6 findings
  • Jan 26, 2023Standard7 findings
  • Aug 29, 2018Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 23, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 11, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Aug 15, 2013—6 findings · 1 harm
  • May 24, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 17, 2011Standard5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction