Deficiency Index

Avamere Rehabilitation Of Hillsboro

Hillsboro, Oregon · CCN 385251

19 surveys since 2010, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
77
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
10
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
87
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
AVAMERE
County
Washington
Medicare-certified since
1996

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
5
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 45 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Oregon.

Last survey on record

May 11, 2026

182 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.974.88
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.68—
Annual nurse turnover33.3%44.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$22,116 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.5%K—L—
Actual harmG37.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2972.5%E410.0%F12.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C25.0%
CMS’s current file: 40 of the 77 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F5612×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

  • F5822×

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Avamere Rehabilitation Of Hillsboro, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689May 11, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were adequately supervised and protected from avoidable accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to:(1) Ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#44), a severely cognitively impaired resident, who was left unsupervised in the community in a high-traffic, [NAME] area for an unknown period of time and was subsequently located and returned to the facility by law enforcement. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF660Mar 11, 2021

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process to ensure post-discharge care and safety needs were met for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for discharge. This failure to provide a safe discharge, determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation, placed resident's health and safety at risk, including symptoms of pain, medical complications, hospital readmission and death. Findings include: The facility's Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a Resident for policy, revised 2016, directed a post-discharge plan would be developed for each resident prior to her/his transfer or discharge. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686May 11, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary treatment to promote healing of pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#92) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure resulted in worsening of Resident 92's pressure ulcers and subsequent hospitalization. Findings include: The facility's Pressure Injuries Overview and Wound Staging Skin Management policy dated 3/2020 included the following:Pressure Ulcer/Injury refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device.Avoidable means that the resident developed a pressure ulcer/injury and that one or more of the following was not completed:- Definition or implementation of interventions that are not… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 15, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to prevent a fall for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#3) reviewed for accidents. As a result, Resident 3 sustained a fracture of the right distal femur (the lower portion of the thigh bone). Findings include: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2013, with diagnoses including fracture of the right hip joint and right femur. Resident 3's 7/26/24 Care Plan revealed Resident 3 was a high fall risk related to a prior fall with right hip injury. Resident 3 was identified as a 2-person transfer with a Hoyer lift (a mechanical device used to lift and transfer residents who have difficulty moving themselves). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Jul 31, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident skin impairments were identified, comprehensively assessed, routinely assessed, treated and monitored for healing or worsening for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#45) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for unidentified, untreated and worsening skin impairments. Findings include: The facility's 12/2010 Skin Program Guideline specified upon admission the nurse will complete a skin evaluation and document the resident's skin condition on the Nursing Database and the resident's clinical record. […]

Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 77 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 11, 2026Standard and complaint13 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 8, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 15, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 21, 2025Standard12 findings
  • Nov 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 31, 2023Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 11, 2021Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Dec 3, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 15, 2019Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Nov 5, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 18, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Mar 22, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 11, 2016Standard and complaint7 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 21, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Jan 29, 2013—6 findings
  • Aug 27, 2012—2 findings
  • Oct 10, 2011—3 findings
  • Nov 2, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction