Deficiency Index

Creswell Post Acute

Creswell, Oregon · CCN 385182

25 surveys since 2011, 18 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
186
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
18
Immediate jeopardy
7
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy7

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
76
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
PACS GROUP
County
Lane
Medicare-certified since
1988

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 45 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Oregon.

Last survey on record

Jan 30, 2026

283 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.044.88
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.38—
Annual nurse turnover44.0%44.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4080.0%E1020.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 50 of the 186 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6773×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F7253×

    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.

  • F6552×

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Creswell Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF695Jan 30, 2026

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care and services for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 3 and 4) reviewed for respiratory services. The facility failed to obtain and follow physician orders for tracheostomy care in a timely and consistent manner, which resulted in multiple hospitalizations This placed residents at risk for respiratory complications. Findings include:The 8/1/24 Tracheostomy Care Policy and Procedure Revealed staff were to verify physician orders and identify the resident. The 2025 facility assessment revealed: staff training/competencies and skill sets are required. Clients are reviewed prior to admission to determine if additional training is needed and is provided. 1. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 6, 2022

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff followed the care plan related to fall safety for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 1) reviewed for accidents. Resident 1 fell and sustained a right [CONDITION(S)]. Findings include: A public complaint was received on 7/13/20 that alleged the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services related to resident's fall. Resident 1 admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses including stroke, abnormal gait and lack of coordination. A comprehensive care plan dated 1/17/20 indicated Resident 1 was a high fall risk and to keep call light in reach, floor free of clutter and Resident 1 was to wear non-skid socks with ambulation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 30, 2026

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure an ice machine had the required air gap for 1 of 2 facility ice machines reviewed for kitchen sanitation. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination and foodborne illness. Findings include: On 1/28/26 at 10:04 AM, Staff 8 (Maintenance Director) was observed cleaning the ice machine in the janitor closet on the North Hall. Staff 8 stated he did not know what an airgap was or if the ice machine had an airgap (space between a water pipe sink or drain that prevents dirty water from flowing back into the clean water supply). Staff 8 confirmed the drainpipe was located below the sink basin and stated he did not believe this presented a problem in the event of the sink backflow. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jan 30, 2026

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to properly sanitize and store resident care equipment for 1 of 3 halls reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for exposure to blood borne pathogens and cross contamination. Findings include:1. On 1/28/26 at 11:19 AM Staff 6 (LPN) was on the central hall checking CBGs (blood sugar measurement) and moved to the south hall. Staff 6 had one glucometer on top of the medication cart with no cleaning supplies in sight. Staff 6 stated he cleaned the glucometer with an alcohol pad and opened the drawer and pointed to small alcohol prep pads. At this time another staff provided Staff 6 with the purple top Super Sani-Cloth Wipes. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF661Oct 9, 2024

    Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a discharge summary which included a final summary of the resident's status for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 2, 4, and 5) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for an unsafe discharge. Findings include: 1. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in July 2024, with diagnoses including diabetes. Review of a Discharge Summary/Plan of Care form dated 8/28/24, revealed the final summary of the resident's status did not include all items consistent with the resident's most recent comprehensive assessment which included but not limited to functional abilities, urinary incontinence, psychosocial well-being, nutritional status, dental care, pressure ulcer and pain. 2. […]

Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 186 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 30, 2026Standard11 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 11, 2025Complaint5 findings
  • Oct 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 30, 2024Standard and complaint17 findings
  • Sep 15, 2023Complaint7 findings
  • May 5, 2023Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Apr 12, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Jan 6, 2022Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • Apr 27, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 4, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 14, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Jul 18, 2019Standard and complaint17 findings
  • Jul 8, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 7, 2018Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 31, 2018Standard and complaint40 findings · 8 harm
  • Jun 6, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2017Standard and complaint26 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 4, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Oct 2, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 30, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 24, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Mar 25, 2014Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 28, 2013—9 findings
  • Mar 8, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 25, 2011—6 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction