Deficiency Index

Aspire Senior Living Moberly

Moberly, Missouri · CCN 265407

26 surveys since 2011, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
109
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
101
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ASPIRE SENIOR LIVING
County
Randolph · rural
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 118 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Missouri.

Last survey on record

May 21, 2026

172 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.503.32
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.23—
Annual nurse turnover60.9%57.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$80,640 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
2

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L12.8%
Actual harmG12.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1438.9%E1541.7%F411.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C12.8%
CMS’s current file: 36 of the 109 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6773×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6072×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6792×

    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Aspire Senior Living Moberly, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF584Sep 9, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for all residents. On 8/22/25, the facility received information from a structural engineer the middle common area framing, in its current condition, was not structurally sound. The structural engineer advised that the area below this needed to be unoccupied until all the framing deficiencies were addressed. The facility continued to utilize the middle common area, which included the resident sitting area toward the front entrance, the central nurses station, and the access to six hallways and the dining room and did not prohibit access until repairs were made. The facility census was 70. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 09/04/25 at 5:08 P.M. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF558Sep 18, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for one resident (Resident #4), in a review of 24 sampled residents, when staff did not ensure the resident had a comfortable wheelchair that fit him/her properly and did not cause him/her discomfort and pain. The resident presented with an increase in depression symptoms and reported that due to not having a comfortable wheelchair, he/she stayed in bed and felt abandoned, thrown away and like nobody cared. The facility also failed to ensure call lights were within reach for three residents (Residents #3, #22 and #29), in a review of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 64. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Oct 26, 2022

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), in a review of five sampled residents, was free from abuse when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) A cursed and was rough with the resident during care. The resident was upset and teary eyed following the incident, and said he/she had never been talked to like this in his/her life. The facility census was 69. On 10/26/22, the administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 10/13/22. On 10/13/22, the facility identified CNA A cursed and was rough with Resident #1 during care. Upon discovery, staff suspended the employee pending investigation, conducted an investigation, and notified the appropriate parties. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Sep 9, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, for 15 of 32 days reviewed. The facility census was 70. Review of the facility policy, Registered Nurse, dated 01/30/24, showed the following: -Purpose: ensure that an RN is available for supervision in the facility;-Procedure: except when waived, the facility must use the services of an RN for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. 1. Review of the facility assessment, revised 05/14/25, showed a staffing plan of eight RN hours per a resident day on the day shift. 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 18, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label, date and cover food items, failed to properly wear hair restraints, failed to utilize proper handwashing and glove use while handling ready to eat food items, failed to maintain the walk-in cooler fan shrouds to be free of a buildup of debris, and failed to ensure the ice machine had an appropriate air gap. The facility census was 64. Review of the facility policy, Labeling and Dating Foods (Date Marking), dated 2020, showed the following: -All foods stored will be properly labeled according to the following guidelines; -Date marking for refrigerated storage food items: Once opened, all ready to eat, potentially hazardous food will be re-dated with a use by date according to current safe food storage… […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 109 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 21, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 9, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 27, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 18, 2024Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 16, 2023Standard9 findings
  • Oct 26, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 1, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 24, 2020Complaint1 finding
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • Jan 21, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2019Standard10 findings
  • Nov 8, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 14, 2018Standard12 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 12, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 13, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Sep 1, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Jul 9, 2015Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 30, 2015Complaint4 findings
  • Dec 2, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 11, 2014Standard4 findings
  • May 1, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 25, 2013—7 findings
  • Aug 23, 2012—9 findings
  • Apr 17, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 18, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 8, 2011—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction