Armour Oaks Senior Living Community
Kansas City, Missouri · CCN 265802
21 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 129
- Surveys
- 21
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 38
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Jackson
- Medicare-certified since
- 2006
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 23 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
May 28, 2026
165 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.27 | 4.52 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.25 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 66.7% | 45.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $25,495 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J12.9% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1851.4% | E1028.6% | F617.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6022×
Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Armour Oaks Senior Living Community, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678May 28, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to contact Emergency Medical Services (EMS), to initiate and provide continuous Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) timely per facility policy for one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of three sampled residents, who was a full code status. The facility census was 31 residents. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified on [DATE] at 2:45 P.M., of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Past Non-Compliance which occurred on [DATE]. On [DATE], the Administrator and DON became aware of the violation of the facility's CPR policy. The facility in-serviced the staff on the CPR policy and procedures, medical emergencies and ensured code status updates for all residents. The IJ was corrected on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Apr 17, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that hot water temperatures from faucets throughout the facility, were consistently between 105 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit) and 120 ºF. Resident rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) on the South east side of the facility, had water temperatures between 94 ºF and 99 ºF. Resident rooms 14, 21, 22, and 12 on the north side of the facility had temperatures that were 120.2- 121.4 ºF; and Resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had water temperatures between 76.1 ºF and 92.3 ºF .The facility also failed to ensure that staff who are checking temperatures allowed to flow for at least 2 minutes before measuring the water temperatures. This practice potentially affected all residents. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 16, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep the walk-in refrigerator, and walk-in freezer floors clean; failed to retain operable thermometers in all refrigerators to confirm adequate temperature ranges; failed to maintain sanitary utensils and food preparation equipment; failed to safeguard against mold possibly getting into food and/or beverages; failed to change the deep fryer oil in a timely manner; failed to consistently document hot food temperatures at the steam table to ensure they were suitably cooked to lessen the chance of bacterial contamination; failed to maintain plastic cutting boards in good condition to avoid food safety hazards (cross-contamination); and failed to store foodstuffs within acceptable temperature parameters, in accordance… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 16, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a comprehensive, infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of water-borne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease), in accordance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who resided, visited, used, or worked in the facility. The facility census was 34 residents with a licensed capacity for 38 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Observation on 1/8/24 between 9:41 A.M. and 10:43 A.M. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Jul 20, 2022
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) on duty eight hours a day, seven days a week. This deficient practice had the potential to negativly affect all residents residing at the facility.The facility's census was 37 residents. Record review of the facility's undated Registered Nurse Staffing Policy, showed: -The facility interpreted state and federal guidelines to say the facility must use the services of a RN for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. -The Director of Nursing (DON) or designated staffing coordinator scheduled at least one eight-hour shift each day on the nursing schedule. -The eight hour shift will be suffice by the RN each day the DON is on site for at least eight consecutive hours. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 129 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 28, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 22, 2025Standard9 findings
- May 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 16, 2024Standard12 findings
- Jun 29, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Feb 15, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jul 20, 2022Standard11 findings
Show the 13 earlier surveys
- Sep 30, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Sep 11, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Sep 18, 2019Standard13 findings
- Sep 7, 2018Standard11 findings
- Nov 9, 2017Standard9 findings
- Sep 21, 2016Standard8 findings
- Feb 19, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Sep 2, 2015Standard6 findings
- Jul 25, 2014Standard11 findings
- Oct 31, 2013Complaint3 findings
- Sep 6, 2013Standard10 findings
- Sep 5, 2012—5 findings
- Sep 20, 2011—10 findings · 2 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction