Alpine Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Xenia, Ohio · CCN 365601
30 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 143
- Surveys
- 30
- Harm or worse
- 8
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Greene
- Medicare-certified since
- 1983
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.
Last survey on record
Aug 5, 2025
461 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.50 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.60 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 54.3% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $28,130 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G24.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3876.0% | E48.0% | F510.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C12.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8804×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6072×
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
- F6372×
Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Alpine Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Apr 8, 2025
THIS DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of physician standing orders, review of hospital records, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from constipation and had interventions to prevent constipation on the care plan. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #75 did not have a bowel movement for five days before a stool softener was prescribed and was transferred out to the hospital and diagnosed with a fecal impaction. This affected one (Resident #75) of three residents reviewed for constipation. The census was 73. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #75 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF690Apr 8, 2025
Based on record review, review of hospital records, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated timely for a urinary tract infections (UTI). This resulted in Actual harm when Resident #75 developed signs and symptoms of a UTI and wasn't treated for the UTI for six days. She transferred out to the hospital and it was discovered the resident had a significant distention in the bladder with renal pelvictasis, (renal pelviectasis, is when urine gathers in the center of the kidney, called the pelvis. This makes the kidney larger than normal. This condition can affect one or both kidneys.) This affected one (Resident #75) of one resident reviewed for UTI. There were no other residents in the facility with a UTI. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Nov 23, 2022
Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, review of facility policy, and review of guidelines from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), the facility failed to implement physician-ordered interventions for residents with pressure ulcers, failed to thoroughly assess resident's skin and failed to identify pressure ulcers until they had already reached an advanced stage. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #76 developed an avoidable unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel on 09/16/22 and Resident #55 developed an avoidable unstageable pressure ulcer to the right heel on 11/17/22. This affected two (#55 and #76) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 84. Findings include: 1. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 23, 2022
Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation to determine potential hazards and resident-specific interventions to reduce and/or eliminate falls and falls with injury. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #87 experienced a fall on 11/06/22 which was not investigated to implement effective interventions. Resident#87 sustained a right comminuted hip fracture from the fall. This affected one (#87) of three residents reviewed for falls. The census was 84. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed an admitted [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Dec 17, 2021
Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to implement the bowel protocol for a resident who had not had a bowel movement in three days. Actual harm occurred when Resident #39 was not documented to have a bowel movement for four days and was subsequently sent to the hospital for abdominal distention, pain, and constipation. This affected one (Resident #39) and had the potential to affect all 65 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 65. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 143 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 21, 2025Standard10 findings
- Apr 8, 2025Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 12, 2024Complaint2 findings
- May 20, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Feb 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 13, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Jan 10, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 22 earlier surveys
- Dec 12, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 23, 2022Complaint8 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 30, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Aug 29, 2022Standard6 findings
- Apr 23, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Mar 17, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Dec 17, 2021Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Aug 25, 2021Complaint5 findings
- Mar 2, 2021Infection control6 findings
- Oct 7, 2020Complaint5 findings
- Jun 25, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Nov 12, 2019Complaint7 findings
- Aug 28, 2019Standard and complaint25 findings
- Aug 12, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 20, 2018Standard17 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 13, 2017Standard4 findings
- May 19, 2016Standard2 findings
- Feb 26, 2015Standard2 findings
- Nov 14, 2013Standard2 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 26, 2012—6 findings
- Apr 8, 2011—11 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction