Deficiency Index

Edgewood Manor Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center

Port Clinton, Ohio · CCN 365489

26 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
100
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
80
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CROWN HEALTHCARE GROUP
County
Ottawa
Medicare-certified since
1980

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Jul 7, 2026

125 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.193.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.59—
Annual nurse turnover55.4%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$28,340 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG24.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2859.6%E919.1%F817.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 47 of the 100 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6903×

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Edgewood Manor Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 7, 2026

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's safety during perineal care. Actual harm occurred on 06/27/26 at 11:29 P.M. when Resident #69 was receiving perineal care from one staff member and the staff turned to obtain a washcloth from the basin and the resident rolled off the bed onto the floor. Resident #69 sustained a laceration to the left eyebrow that required skin glue to close and sustained left periorbital soft tissue swelling and hematoma. This affected one, (Resident #69) of one reviewed for falls.Findings included: Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/26/25. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 18, 2024

    Based on record review, hospital discharge instruction reviewed, witness statement review, fall occurrence evaluation review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident requiring two staff members for bed mobility was implemented which resulted in a fall from the bed with an injury. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #65, who was moderately cognitively impaired, required the assistance of two staff for bed mobility sustained a fall from bed, when one staff member was providing care, and the resident fell to the floor. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF802Jul 7, 2026

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of facility staffing, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure sufficient dietary staff were available to timely [NAME] the dietary needs of the residents. The facility's failure to provide adequate dietary staffing had the potential to affect all residents, as the facility identified no residents who did not receive meals and food services from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 71.Findings include:Observation on 06/28/26 at 7:50 A.M. revealed an insufficient number of dietary staff available to complete meal preparation, tray assembly, and meal distribution. Dietary [NAME] #119 could not be located by Dishwasher #170. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Jul 7, 2026

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure dietary staff verified the final cooking temperature of potentially hazardous food prior to placing the food into hot holding. This had the potential to affect all 71 residents receiving meals prepared by the dietary department. The census was 71. Findings include:Observation of lunch preparation on 06/28/26 at approximately 12:30 P.M., revealed the facilities business manager (BM) #104 acting as dietary staff transferred cooked hamburgers directly from the grill to the steam table without obtaining or documenting the internal temperature of the hamburgers prior to placement into hot holding.Interview on 06/28/26 at approximately 12:30 P.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF809Jul 7, 2026

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve meals in accordance with established meal schedules. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 71 residents receiving meals from the dietary department. The census was 71. Findings include:Interview with the facility Administrator on 06/28/26 at 10:45 A.M. verified the lunch service would be pushed back to start serving at 12:45 P.M. due to the delayed breakfast times. Administrator verified with surveyor that all Residents and staff would be notified. Meal service was delayed beyond the facility's scheduled mealtimes due to inadequate staffing that affected the delivery of breakfast.Observation on 06/28/26 of the lunch tray line began at approximately 1:30 P.M. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 100 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 7, 2026Standard14 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 13, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 13, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 18, 2024Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 8, 2024Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Sep 12, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 24, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Nov 22, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • Nov 2, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 9, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Jun 25, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • May 30, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 19, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 31, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 4, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 9, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Jun 8, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Apr 18, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2016Standard10 findings
  • Dec 11, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Aug 29, 2013—3 findings
  • Apr 7, 2011—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction