Deficiency Index

Arbors at Fairlawn the

Fairlawn, Ohio · CCN 365689

32 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
138
Surveys
32
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/32

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
88
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
ARBORS AT OHIO
County
Summit
Medicare-certified since
1986

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

May 12, 2025

546 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.583.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.44—
Annual nurse turnover46.1%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG38.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2466.7%E513.9%F411.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 36 of the 138 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6895×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6232×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F6902×

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Arbors at Fairlawn the, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Feb 6, 2023

    Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, physician interview, review of an emergency medical services (EMS) run report, review of hospital documentation including a surgical operative note, medication manufacture guidelines, review of Centers for Disease Control guidance on sepsis, and review of facility policies regarding abuse, change of condition, and sepsis protocol, the facility failed to prevent an incident of neglect involving Resident #2 following an acute change in condition when the change was not timely identified and medical treatment was not timely obtained. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 10, 2024

    Based on medical record review, review of the ambulance run report, review of hospital documents, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) investigation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #73 was provided a transfer to bed in a safe manner to prevent an incident/accident with major injury. Actual harm occurred on 08/25/24 when Resident #73, who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on two staff with maximal assistance needed for transfers, sustained a 10-centimeter laceration that went to the bone with profuse bleeding to her right calf during a staff assisted transfer. As a result of the incident/injury, Resident #73 was emergently transferred to the local hospital on 08/25/24 for treatment which included 21 sutures to the wound. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 6, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent and timely identify the development of pressure ulcers and/or to ensure adequate treatments were in place to promote healing. This affected two residents (#25 and #40) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 54. Actual Harm occurred on 12/06/22 when Resident #40, who required extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility, developed a new, in-house acquired deep tissue injury to the sacrum without evidence of adequate preventative interventions including turning and repositioning. The facility failed to identify the pressure ulcer prior to it being identified as a deep tissue injury. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Aug 15, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely provide care and treatment to ensure one resident (Resident #50) did not develop a pressure injury of the sacrum. Actual harm occurred when Resident #50 developed a Stage 4 (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer. Slough and/or eschar may be visible on some parts of the wound bed. Epibole [rolled edges], undermining and/or tunneling often occur. Depth varies by anatomical location.) of the sacrum. The facility also failed to ensure pressure injuries of a lower stage did not develop for Resident #47. This affected two of three residents (#47, #50, and #57) reviewed for pressure injuries. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Mar 11, 2025

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to ensure the residents received timely assistance with showers/bathing, incontinence care, dressing, personal hygiene, and changing of soiled sheets. This affected six of six residents (Resident #9, #13, #38, #46, #49, and #56) reviewed for sufficient staffing and had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #46 revealed an admitted [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact. Resident #46 required supervision or touch assistants with bathing and tub/shower transfers. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 138 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 6, 2026Standard and complaint9 findings
  • May 12, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 11, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Jan 9, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 10, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 13, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Feb 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 6, 2023Complaint9 findings · 2 harm
Show the 24 earlier surveys
  • Aug 15, 2022Standard10 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 16, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 7, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 31, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 17, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2019Standard10 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 19, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 13, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Mar 26, 2018Complaint8 findings
  • Oct 31, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • May 4, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Mar 23, 2017Complaint9 findings
  • Mar 1, 2017Complaint8 findings
  • Dec 13, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Dec 1, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 11, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Aug 29, 2013—1 finding
  • May 17, 2012—5 findings
  • Mar 6, 2011—7 findings
  • Dec 6, 2010—1 finding
  • Nov 18, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction