Adams Farm Living & Rehabilitation
Jamestown, North Carolina · CCN 345535
16 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 45
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CENTURY CARE MANAGEMENT
- County
- Guilford
- Medicare-certified since
- 2005
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Dec 5, 2025
339 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.48 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.36 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 56.8% | 49.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $24,252 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G337.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D337.5% | E225.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Adams Farm Living & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF580May 1, 2025
Based on record review and interviews with RP (Responsible Party), staff, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Physician the facility failed to notify the RP when Resident # 1's seizure medication was discontinued. Interview with the RP revealed if she had been notified, she would have been an advocate for Resident # 1 and informed the facility that the resident's seizure medication was not to be discontinued prior to a neurologist evaluating the resident and making the decision. Resident # 1 seized following the seizure medication discontinuation and was hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit. This was for one (Resident #1) of three sampled residents whose medications were reviewed. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident # 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684May 1, 2025
Based on record review and interviews with staff, Physicians, Nurse Practitioners (NPs), and Responsible Party (RP) the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #1) received follow-up for a newly diagnosed disorder per a plan of care set forth upon discharge from the hospital and received seizure medication. Resident # 1 was hospitalized from 11/4/24 to 11/15/24 with diffuse encephalopathy (disease of the brain that alters brain function and structure) and seizure like activity. Hospital discharge plans on 11/15/24 included orders for a seizure medication (Keppra) and directions that Resident # 1 should follow up with neurology. The facility never arranged a neurology follow-up visit as directed. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF711May 1, 2025
Based on record review, and staff, Physician, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interview the facility failed to ensure during visits the providers reviewed the total plan of care for Resident # 1's newly diagnosed neurological disorder when there was a change in primary providers and collaborative health care providers added to health care decision making for the resident. Multiple providers saw Resident # 1 and failed to recognize the hospital discharge plan was to have the neurologist see the resident and no appointment had been set up for her and completed prior to discontinuation of her seizure medication. On 2/12/25 Resident # 1's seizure medication was discontinued. Interviews with Resident # 1's NP and Physician revealed neither recalled giving the order. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Aug 21, 2024
Based on record review, observation and staff interviews the facility failed to label medications which were not stored in the pharmacy or manufacturer packaging (500 hall medication cart for medication storage review for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed) . 1.An observation of the 400-hall medication cart was conducted on 08/21/24 at 10:49 AM in the presence of Nurse #3 and Nurse #4. The medication cart contained 4 loose pills of various shapes, colors, and sizes on the bottom of cart drawers. Nurse #4 indicated each nurse assigned to the medication cart was responsible for cleaning the medication cart they were assigned to, ensuring it was organized, and well stocked. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing on 08/21/24 at 11:15 AM. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 21, 2024
Based on observations, record review, and interviews of staff, the facility failed to clean the top and bottom ovens as evidenced by brown and black soiling for 2 of 2 ovens, and the facility failed to label and date perishable food items when opened or date when to discard in the walk-in refrigerator. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: 1. On [DATE] at 9:55 am an interview and observation of the kitchen was done with the Dietary Manager in training. Observation of the 2 ovens' tops and bottoms had burnt on food stains and burnt food debris on the bottom pan and brown and black soiling on the interior walls and racks. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 45 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 5, 2025Standard1 finding
- May 1, 2025Complaint5 findings · 3 harm
- Aug 21, 2024Standard and complaint2 findings
- Apr 14, 2022Standard1 finding
- Feb 27, 2020Standard and complaint2 findings
- Feb 27, 2019Standard2 findings
- Nov 21, 2018Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 19, 2018Complaint1 finding
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Jul 6, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Apr 16, 2018Standard and complaint6 findings
- May 24, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings
- May 26, 2016Standard4 findings
- Jun 11, 2015Standard1 finding
- Jul 25, 2014Standard and complaint7 findings
- Apr 4, 2013—1 finding
- May 3, 2012—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction