Deficiency Index

Abbotsford Health Care Center

Abbotsford, Wisconsin · CCN 525435

28 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
109
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
78
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
BEDROCK HEALTHCARE
County
Marathon
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 51 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Jun 29, 2026

133 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.163.71
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.84—
Annual nurse turnover44.4%44.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$15,939 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ11.9%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3667.9%E713.2%F713.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B11.9%C11.9%
CMS’s current file: 53 of the 109 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6576×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6844×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6102×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Abbotsford Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 22, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident utilizing a Hoyer lift for transfers received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) transferred R1 utilizing a Hoyer lift from the bed to the chair without assistance from another staff member. Facility policy states all mechanical lift transfers require 2 people. R1 slipped out of the Hoyer lift sling, fell to the floor, and struck R1's head sustaining a subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, a right posterior scalp laceration and hematoma, and required hospitalization . R1's condition declined as a result. R1 was verbal, but nonsensical prior to the fall, and is now nonverbal. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Dec 28, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the necessary treatment and care to prevent pressure ulcers and promote healing of pressure ulcers for 2 of 2 Residents (R40, R30). This resulted in R40 sustaining a left ischial stage IV pressure ulcer with 6 cm tunneling to the bone with subsequent VRE ([MEDICATION(S)] Resistant Enterococcus) in bone, causing [CONDITION(S)] to pelvis, [CONDITION(S)], Intravenous antibiotic therapy for 3 weeks, wound vacuum therapy, and multiple surgical interventions. The facility did not implement a ROHO cushion or pressure mapping as ordered for R40 on 7/7/21 and again on 9/17/21. The facility did not add these to the care plan or update the care plan from 6/30 - 9/30/21. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Oct 5, 2022

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not identify the need to seek further medical treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . R1 was admitted after transmetatarsal amputation. R1's dressing was not changed, nor was the surgical wound assessed on a regular basis. R1 developed infection in the wound along with dehiscence of the wound that required hospitalization . This was evidenced by the following: R1, a [AGE] year-old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital with history of a right great toe amputation. Past history of infections. R1 made their own medical decisions. R1 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . R1's Admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) indicated that R1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jun 2, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, which has the potential to affect all 39 residents.-The facility's infection control surveillance was incomplete and missing pertinent information to help prevent the spread of infection.-A wet/soiled incontinence brief was observed on the nightstand of a resident's room (R32).Findings include:The facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, last revised 07/2025 includes: A system of surveillance is utilized for prevention, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF881Jun 2, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the Infection Prevention and Control Program included an Antibiotic Stewardship Program monitoring antibiotic use which has the potential to affect all 39 residents.-The facility does not currently have an antibiotic stewardship program in place.Findings include:The facility policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship Program, last revised November 2017, includes: It is the policy of this facility to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program as part of the facility's overall infection prevention and control program. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 109 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 29, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 2, 2026Standard and complaint16 findings
  • Mar 11, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 10, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 29, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 8, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 3, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Dec 30, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Jul 22, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 22, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Jan 30, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 19, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 14, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 2, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Oct 5, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 19, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 28, 2021Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 8, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 28, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Jul 21, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Sep 2, 2015Complaint5 findings
  • Jun 25, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Jul 24, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Jul 18, 2013—9 findings
  • Aug 16, 2012—10 findings
  • Aug 10, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction