Deficiency Index

F886 citations in Maryland

Infection Control Deficiencies

Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

F886 in Maryland. Pick another state for the same tag.

Against expectation — 2023

Maryland cites F886 more often than its own record predicts

Versus expected share1.07×

1.07 times the share F886 takes of citations nationally.

Share of Maryland citations0.08%

Of every deficiency written in Maryland in 2023, this is the portion that was F886.

Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.

In the surveyor’s words

What Maryland surveyors wrote

F886 findings written in Maryland, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.

Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.

E · No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternApril 6, 2023

Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistently acquire resident vital signs timely for the Daily COVID-19 tool assessments. This was evident for 3 of 3 residents reviewed during the infection control part of the annual survey. The findings include: On 3/27/23 Surveyor reviewed random selection of residents identified as new admissions and monitored for COVID-19. 1. During the review of the medical record regarding COVID-19 daily screenings for Resident #95 on 3/27/23 revealed the following: Daily Covid Tool completed 3/26/23 at 3:45 AM with vital signs for 3/15/23 at 6:20 PM, these vital signs also were put in for the 3/15/2023 11:31 PM assessment. 2. …

Sterling Care Riverside

What else Maryland surveyors cite →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction