Deficiency Index

F886 citations in Connecticut

Infection Control Deficiencies

Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

F886 in Connecticut. Pick another state for the same tag.

No F886 citations were recorded in Connecticut for 2025. That means none appear in the CMS file for that year — not that the requirement does not apply.

In the surveyor’s words

What Connecticut surveyors wrote

F886 findings written in Connecticut, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.

Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.

E · No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternApril 6, 2023

Based on facility documentation, facility policy, and interview, the facility failed to conduct resident testing in accordance to the facility's policy and per the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines. The findings include: In an interview and review of the facility's resident testing documentation with the DNS on 4/6/23 at 2:08 PM, it was identified that the first positive case for the current COVID-19 outbreak occurred on 3/31/23 (day 0) on the East Wing. The facility used a broad based COVID-19 testing strategy and tested all the residents on the East Wing on 4/1/23 (day 1), on 4/4/23 (day 4) 3 residents were tested, and on 4/5/23 (day 5) all residents who previously tested negative were retested. The DNS failed to ensure testing was conducted on 4/3/23 (day 3). …

Apple Rehab Saybrook

What else Connecticut surveyors cite →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction