Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 4 of 7 facility employed nursing assistants' (nursing assistant (NA)-B, NA-H, NA-I, and NA-L) certificates were current with the states nursing assistant registry. This had the potential to affect all thirty-two residents that resided in the facility.Findings include: Review of the State of Minnesota Nursing assistant registry on [DATE] identified the following:-NA-B's nurse aide certificate expired on [DATE].-NA-H's nurse aide certificate expired on [DATE].-NA-I's nurse aide certificate expired on [DATE].-NA-L's nurse aide certificate expired on [DATE].The facility's employee records were reviewed on [DATE] and identified NA-B, NA-H, NA-I, and NA-L were scheduled and completed shifts from [DATE] thought [DATE] with an… …
F839 citations in Minnesota
Administration Deficiencies
Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Minnesota cites F839 less often than its own record predicts
0.69 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2025, this is the portion that was F839.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Minnesota surveyors wrote
F839 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Minnesota citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.06% | 1.64× |
| 2025 | 0.04% | 0.69× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Minnesota surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction