Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were receiving restorative services for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 28) reviewed for rehabilitative services. This failure placed residents at risk of a diminished quality of life when not receiving the necessary services to maintain or increase their muscle weaknesses.Finding included.Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The significant change Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 06/26/2026, indicated Resident 28 was alert and oriented. During an interview on 08/03/2026 at 2:09 PM, Resident 28 said she was admitted for rehabilitation but had not received any therapy. …
F825 citations in Washington
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Washington cites F825 more often than its own record predicts
2.81 times the share F825 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Washington in 2025, this is the portion that was F825.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Washington surveyors wrote
F825 findings written in Washington, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Washington citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.32% | 2.63× |
| 2024 | 0.12% | 1.05× |
| 2025 | 0.42% | 2.81× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Washington surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction