F800 in Minnesota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Minnesota cites F800 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.40×
0.40 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Minnesota citations0.04%
Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2025, this is the portion that was F800.
Minnesota0.04%
National0.10%
Share of all citations that were F800.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Minnesota surveyors wrote
F800 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJanuary 9, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure dietary preferences were accommodated for 1 of 1 resident (R17) reviewed for food preferences.
Findings include:
R17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, did not have behaviors, did not reject cares, required setup or clean-up assistance with eating, had malnutrition or was at risk for malnutrition, morbid obesity, diabetes, did not have signs or symptoms of a swallowing disorder, did not have weight loss or gain, was not on a therapeutic or mechanically altered diet. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction