F779 in Vermont. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2024
Vermont cites F779 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share38.65×
38.65 times the share F779 takes of citations nationally.
Share of Vermont citations0.32%
Of every deficiency written in Vermont in 2024, this is the portion that was F779.
Vermont0.32%
National0.01%
Share of all citations that were F779.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Vermont surveyors wrote
F779 findings written in Vermont, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedSeptember 18, 2024
Per interview and record review, the facility failed to file in the resident's clinical record signed and dated x-ray reports for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #24). The failure to ensure radiology results were filed in the resident's clinical record placed him/her at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included:
Record review reveals that Resident #24 had a physician order for a chest x-ray dated 8/29/24, and a left hand x-ray dated 6/25/24. A review of Resident #24's medical record does not include a signed and dated copy of the x-ray reports or results of either x-ray. The record does not include any physician or nursing documentation that the above x-ray reports were received and reviewed by the physician. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction