Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to file in the resident's clinical record of radiologic and other diagnostic services for 2 of 8 (Residents #3, #4) residents reviewed for clinical records. -Resident #3's blood test result ordered on 9/14/2025 was not in his medical records reviewed on 10/08/2025.-Resident #4's blood test results ordered on 2/8/2025, 3/16/2025, 3/18/2025 and 4/11/2025 were not in his medical records reviewed on 10/08/2025.This failure puts residents at risk of not having a complete picture of their current health status in their records.Findings included:Resident #3Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 10/06/2025 reflected an [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] and last re-admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including… …
F779 citations in Texas
Administration Deficiencies
Keep signed and dated reports of x-rays and other diagnostic services in the residents record.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Texas cites F779 more often than its own record predicts
1.88 times the share F779 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Texas in 2025, this is the portion that was F779.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Texas surveyors wrote
F779 findings written in Texas, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
What else Texas surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction