Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure laboratory reports were filed in the clinical record for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for edema monitoring.Findings include:R4's face sheet identified diagnoses of heart failure and diabetes.R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R4 had moderate cognitive impairment, no behaviors, no rejection of cares, and needed partial/moderate assistance for transfer. R4's progress note dated 7/6/26 at 6:22 a.m., identified R4 had concerns about her lungs filling up with fluid again and requested to see a doctor. R4's nurse practitioner note dated 7/6/26, identified R4 had been seen for evaluation of shortness of breath. …
F775 citations in Minnesota
Administration Deficiencies
Keep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Minnesota cites F775 more often than its own record predicts
1.91 times the share F775 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2025, this is the portion that was F775.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Minnesota surveyors wrote
F775 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
What else Minnesota surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction