Based on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 168) was assessed and reviewed for risk and benefits, appropriate alternatives were attempted prior to installing the bed rail, and physician orders were obtained for bed rails. The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk of injury such as falls, entrapment, and broken bones. Findings include: Resident 168 (R168) R168 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, lack of coordination, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, and a fracture of the base of the neck of the right femur. …
F700 citations in Nevada
Bed rails · Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Nevada cites F700 less often than its own record predicts
0.84 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in Nevada in 2025, this is the portion that was F700.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Nevada surveyors wrote
F700 findings written in Nevada, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Nevada citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.93% | 2.49× |
| 2024 | 0.89% | 2.09× |
| 2025 | 0.33% | 0.84× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Nevada surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction