Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to obtain the residents' consent for bedrails use and conduct accurate risks and benefits assessments for 7 residents (#'s 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 12, and 167), out of 8 sampled residents and 2 unsampled residents (#s 11 and 13), reviewed for bedrails use. This failed practice had the potential to place the residents at risk of falls, entrapment, and other preventable accidents and potentially place residents at risk of feelings of isolation and helplessness. …
F700 citations in Alaska
Bed rails · Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Alaska cites F700 more often than its own record predicts
2.73 times the share F700 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Alaska in 2025, this is the portion that was F700.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Alaska surveyors wrote
F700 findings written in Alaska, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Alaska citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.78% | 1.81× |
| 2025 | 1.06% | 2.73× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Alaska surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction