F692 in Minnesota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Minnesota cites F692 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.75×
0.75 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Minnesota citations0.85%
Of every deficiency written in Minnesota in 2025, this is the portion that was F692.
Minnesota0.85%
National1.14%
Share of all citations that were F692.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Minnesota surveyors wrote
F692 findings written in Minnesota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
G · Actual harm, isolatedAugust 5, 2025
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively and accurately re-assess, develop and implement interventions to reduce/prevent significant and continued weight loss for 1 of 3 resident (R2) reviewed for weight loss. This resulted in actual harm when R2 was hospitalized for malnutrition. Findings Include: Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) considers weight loss ‘significant' if it exceeds 5 percent (%) within one month, 7.5% within three months, or 10% within six months. …
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedAugust 27, 2026
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to assess a resident with significant weight loss for 1 of 6 residents (R107) reviewed for nutrition.
Findings include:
R107's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and diagnoses of compression fractures to lumbar and thoracic vertebrae, anxiety disorder, low back pain and constipation. R107 was independent with eating and had no known weight loss.
R107's care plan identified a focus statement dated 6/21/26, for potential for alteration in nutrition related to diagnoses and a mini-nutrition risk assessment identifying R107 was at risk for malnutrition. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction