F692 in Louisiana. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Louisiana cites F692 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.62×
0.62 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Louisiana citations0.71%
Of every deficiency written in Louisiana in 2025, this is the portion that was F692.
Louisiana0.71%
National1.14%
Share of all citations that were F692.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Louisiana surveyors wrote
F692 findings written in Louisiana, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedAugust 9, 2024
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status/electrolyte balance for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for nutritional status as evidence by:
1. Failing to ensure staff followed-up on and/or implemented a dietitian's recommendation (Resident #1); and,
2. Failing to ensure staff assisted a resident with maintaining their food and/or fluid intake to suit their dietary needs (Resident #1).
This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 07/12/2024 at 6:08 p.m. for Resident #1 when Resident #1 was unable to adequately eat or drink and no adjustments were made to suit Resident #1's dietary needs. …
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement, monitor, and modify interventions, consistent with the resident's assessed needs and current professional standards of practice, to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 2 (Resident #3, and Resident #36) of 3 (Resident #3, Resident #14, and Resident #36) residents sampled for nutrition.
The facility failed to ensure:
1. Meal intake was recorded for every meal for Resident #3 as care planned;
2. Resident #3 was assisted with all meals as care planned;
3. The MD/NP was notified when Resident #3 refused to eat, as care planned;
4. The MD/NP was notified of a severe weight loss for Resident #3; and
5. …
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJuly 15, 2026
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement physician orders to address weight loss by failing to offer a dietary supplement that was ordered for 1 (Resident #8) out of 2 residents investigated for nutrition.Findings:Review of Resident #8's electronic medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, type two diabetes mellitus, anorexia, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition.A review of Resident #8's Weights and Vitals Summary revealed a weight of 147 pounds on 02/09/2026 and a weight of 141 pounds on 03/13/2026. This was a 4.08% weight loss in 30 days. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction