F659 in New Jersey. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
New Jersey cites F659 more often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share1.18×
1.18 times the share F659 takes of citations nationally.
Share of New Jersey citations0.05%
Of every deficiency written in New Jersey in 2025, this is the portion that was F659.
New Jersey0.05%
National0.04%
Share of all citations that were F659.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What New Jersey surveyors wrote
F659 findings written in New Jersey, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedNovember 7, 2025
Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that services were delivered by qualified staff with the necessary skills, experience, and knowledge. As a result, care was not provided in accordance with the resident's assessed needs and plan of care. This deficiency was identified in 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1).This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During an interview with the surveyor on 11/07/25 at 11:10 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained that the Resident #1's family pays for a private sitter (PS) to be with the resident from 3:00 PM to 8:00 PM, Sunday through Saturday. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction