Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that services provided or arranged in accordance with the resident's plan of care were delivered by individuals who have the skills, experience and knowledge to do a particular task or activity for one (#80) of five residents reviewed for quality of care out of 35 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #80 was assessed by a registered nurse (RN) following a fall on 12/13/25. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Fall Management System policy and procedure, revised 1/20/26, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/12/26 at 4:41 p.m. …
F659 citations in Colorado
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Colorado cites F659 more often than its own record predicts
11.57 times the share F659 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Colorado in 2025, this is the portion that was F659.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Colorado surveyors wrote
F659 findings written in Colorado, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Colorado citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.68% | 17.75× |
| 2024 | 0.15% | 5.06× |
| 2025 | 0.45% | 11.57× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Colorado surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction