F644 in South Dakota. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
South Dakota cites F644 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.53×
0.53 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of South Dakota citations0.34%
Of every deficiency written in South Dakota in 2025, this is the portion that was F644.
South Dakota0.34%
National0.64%
Share of all citations that were F644.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What South Dakota surveyors wrote
F644 findings written in South Dakota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJuly 30, 2026
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure that two of five sampled residents (65 and 73) had a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level II (a tool used to evaluate a resident's health status and to develop an individualized care plan to manage the resident's care needs) completed.Findings Include:
1.Review of resident 65's EMR revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included depressive disorder, hallucinations, and hoarding disorder. She had a 5/25/23 PASRR Level 1 completed. Her 9/11/23 PASRR Level II screening form determined resident 65 was exempt from a Level II review as the diagnosis of a mental illness was unsubstantiated. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction