.Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to comply with PASRR Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review - requirements by not incorporating the PASRR Level II determination into the resident's assessment, care planning, and discharge planning for 1 Resident (#113), out of one resident reviewed for PASRR documentation. The PASRR Level II evaluation identified the need for continued nursing facility services and required specialized mental health services. The facility did not ensure the Level II report was available at admission, did not initiate specialized services during the stay, did not revise the care plan to reflect PASRR findings, and discharged the resident without addressing PASRR-identified needs or following recommended discharge options. …
F644 citations in Alaska
PASARR coordination · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Alaska cites F644 less often than its own record predicts
0.83 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in Alaska in 2025, this is the portion that was F644.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Alaska surveyors wrote
F644 findings written in Alaska, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
.Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) program. Specifically, the facility failed to follow the directives of the PASRR Level I determination to notify the State of Alaska Division of Senior and Disability Services (SDS) for 1 resident (#4), out of 13 residents reviewed, when the resident stayed beyond their approved convalescent care period. This failed practice resulted in Resident #4 remaining in the facility without the required PASRR Level II evaluation to determine whether the resident required specialized services, which had the potential to adversely affect the resident's ability to attain or maintain his/her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. …
What else Alaska surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction