Deficiency Index

F637 citations in South Dakota

Assessment after a significant change · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

F637 in South Dakota. Pick another state for the same tag.

Against expectation — 2025

South Dakota cites F637 less often than its own record predicts

Versus expected share0.70×

0.70 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.

Share of South Dakota citations0.17%

Of every deficiency written in South Dakota in 2025, this is the portion that was F637.

Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.

In the surveyor’s words

What South Dakota surveyors wrote

F637 findings written in South Dakota, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.

Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.

D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedFebruary 20, 2026

Based on record review, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure one of four sampled resident (3) who was recently admitted to hospice (specialized care for individuals with a terminal illness that focuses on comfort and quality of life rather than curative treatments) services had a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a tool used to evaluate a resident's health status and to develop an individualized care plan to manage the resident's care needs) completed within 14 days after the resident admitted to hospice.Findings include:1. …

Good Samaritan Society Miller

What else South Dakota surveyors cite →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction