Deficiency Index

F635 citations in Idaho

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

F635 in Idaho. Pick another state for the same tag.

Against expectation — 2024

Idaho cites F635 more often than its own record predicts

Versus expected share4.26×

4.26 times the share F635 takes of citations nationally.

Share of Idaho citations0.21%

Of every deficiency written in Idaho in 2024, this is the portion that was F635.

Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.

In the surveyor’s words

What Idaho surveyors wrote

F635 findings written in Idaho, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.

Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.

D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedApril 2, 2026

Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' hospital discharge instructions were reviewed upon admission to the facility to assure physician orders were in place to meet their medical needs. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#9 and #37) whose records were reviewed. This failure placed these residents at risk of delayed respiratory care and assessments. Findings include:1. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (tissues are deprived of adequate oxygen causing shortness of breath) and obstructive sleep apnea.On 3/30/26 at 8:14 AM, observed in Resident #37's room, sitting on his dresser, a CPAP machine (a mask and air pump to keep airways open… …

Eagle Rock Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia

What else Idaho surveyors cite →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction