Deficiency Index

F627 citations in Washington

Resident Rights Deficiencies

Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

F627 in Washington. Pick another state for the same tag.

Against expectation — 2025

Washington cites F627 more often than its own record predicts

Versus expected share1.34×

1.34 times the share F627 takes of citations nationally.

Share of Washington citations0.42%

Of every deficiency written in Washington in 2025, this is the portion that was F627.

Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.

In the surveyor’s words

What Washington surveyors wrote

F627 findings written in Washington, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.

Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.

D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedAugust 11, 2026

Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge plan was in place for 1 of 2 residents (1) reviewed for discharges. The facility failed to develop a patient-centered discharge plan by the interdisciplinary team for 2 of 3 residents (1 & 2) reviewed for discharge planning. These failures placed residents at risk of unsafe discharge and unmet care needs.Findings included.<Resident 1>Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and a fracture to the tibia. …

Avamere Rehabilitation at Ridgemont

What else Washington surveyors cite →

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction