Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge plan was in place for 1 of 2 residents (1) reviewed for discharges. The facility failed to develop a patient-centered discharge plan by the interdisciplinary team for 2 of 3 residents (1 & 2) reviewed for discharge planning. These failures placed residents at risk of unsafe discharge and unmet care needs.Findings included.<Resident 1>Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and a fracture to the tibia. …
F627 citations in Washington
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Washington cites F627 more often than its own record predicts
1.34 times the share F627 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Washington in 2025, this is the portion that was F627.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Washington surveyors wrote
F627 findings written in Washington, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
What else Washington surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction