Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process for 2 (R #40 and R #57) of 6 (R #15, R #30, R #31, R #40, R #47, and R #57) residents reviewed for discharge, when staff failed to: 1. Conduct IDT discharge planning for R #40 and R #57. 2. Update comprehensive care plans and discharge plans with treatment preferences and needs for R #40 and R #57.3. Document a discharge plan of care that included treatment preferences and needs for R #57. These failures have the potential for unsafe discharge and an increased risk of resident harm. The findings are: R #40 A. Record review of R #40's admission Record, no date, revealed R #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 03/14/26. B. …
F627 citations in New Mexico
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
New Mexico cites F627 more often than its own record predicts
1.03 times the share F627 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in New Mexico in 2025, this is the portion that was F627.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What New Mexico surveyors wrote
F627 findings written in New Mexico, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
What else New Mexico surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction