Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident had an appropriate and safe discharge for 1(Resident #362) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. Specifically, Resident #392 did not feel they were discharged appropriately, did not have a discharge planning meeting with Social Work and did not receive adequate discharge education or written notice of their rights to appeal the decision. This is evidenced by: Resident # 362 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of fracture of one femur, repaired (broken hip repaired surgically), polysubstance abuse (drug and alcohol abuse) and unspecified osteoarthritis (arthritis of the bones and joints). …
F622 citations in New York
Transfer and discharge · Resident Rights Deficiencies
Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
New York cites F622 less often than its own record predicts
0.32 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Of every deficiency written in New York in 2025, this is the portion that was F622.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What New York surveyors wrote
F622 findings written in New York, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of New York citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.21% | 0.82× |
| 2024 | 0.18% | 0.55× |
| 2025 | 0.04% | 0.32× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else New York surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction