Based on interview, clinical record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident not meeting the circumstances of discharge requirements was permitted to remain in the facility for 1 of 2 residents sampled for closed records (Resident #25). This deficient practice had the potential to result in an unnecessary and unsafe discharge. Findings include: Resident #25 Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 01/22/2025, with a primary diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. …
F622 citations in Nevada
Transfer and discharge · Resident Rights Deficiencies
Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
Against expectation — 2025
Nevada cites F622 more often than its own record predicts
1.41 times the share F622 takes of citations nationally.
Of every deficiency written in Nevada in 2025, this is the portion that was F622.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Nevada surveyors wrote
F622 findings written in Nevada, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
The short window
Recent years
| Year | Share of Nevada citations | vs expected |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.19% | 0.73× |
| 2024 | 0.51% | 1.59× |
| 2025 | 0.16% | 1.41× |
Shares of citations, not counts: earlier years hold fewer inspections.
What else Nevada surveyors cite →
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction