F605 in Idaho. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
Idaho cites F605 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.24×
0.24 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of Idaho citations0.17%
Of every deficiency written in Idaho in 2025, this is the portion that was F605.
Idaho0.17%
National0.70%
Share of all citations that were F605.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What Idaho surveyors wrote
F605 findings written in Idaho, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
G · Actual harm, isolatedNovember 9, 2018
Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility did not ensure residents were free from chemical restraints. There was no documented evidence a systematic process of evaluation and care planning was utilized for staff to first implement resident-specific focused non-pharmacological interventions should residents demonstrate aggressive behaviors. This resulted in harm to 1 of 6 residents (Resident #261) reviewed for [MEDICAL CONDITION] drug use. Resident #261 was harmed when he experienced increased somnolence, sedation, and a decline in ADL's as a result of multiple [MEDICAL CONDITION] medications. …
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedAugust 7, 2026
Based on record review, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to physician's orders. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for unnecessary medication. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if Resident #25 medication administration was not followed as ordered. Findings include: The facility's Physician's Orders policy, revised 2/11/26, documented the facility is obligated to follow and carry out the orders of the prescriber in accordance with all applicable state and federal guidelines. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction