F559 in New Jersey. Pick another state for the same tag.
Against expectation — 2025
New Jersey cites F559 less often than its own record predicts
Versus expected share0.41×
0.41 times the national share — cited less often here than elsewhere.
Share of New Jersey citations0.05%
Of every deficiency written in New Jersey in 2025, this is the portion that was F559.
New Jersey0.05%
National0.11%
Share of all citations that were F559.
Each state is measured against its own expected share, not against other states.
In the surveyor’s words
What New Jersey surveyors wrote
F559 findings written in New Jersey, one from each severity band recorded here, most serious first.
Severity is as the surveyor wrote it. Some findings had already been corrected before the survey.
D · No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedJanuary 24, 2025
Complaint #: NJ00182358, NJ00169293
Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide evidence that two of two residents (Resident (R) 5 and R30) reviewed for room transfers in a total sample of 34 residents were notified of the reason in writing for the transfer and when the transfer would occur prior to being transferred to another room in the facility. This failure had the potential to impact the emotional well-being of the residents facing the challenge of a new roommate.
Findings include:
1. …
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction