Woodland Health and Rehabilitation
Mount Pleasant, Iowa · CCN 165478
29 surveys since 2011, 18 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 134
- Surveys
- 29
- Harm or worse
- 18
- Immediate jeopardy
- 9
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 62
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- THE ENSIGN GROUP
- County
- Henry · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2003
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 137 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Iowa.
Last survey on record
Apr 22, 2026
201 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.40 | 3.63 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 32.6% | 44.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $10,842 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J211.8% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1376.5% | E15.9% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B15.9% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Woodland Health and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF686Nov 3, 2021
Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, interview with Wound Clinicians, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for three of five residents reviewed with pressure injuries (Residents #2, #4, and #7). The facility failed to ensure transportation secured for all residents requiring wound clinic services. For Resident #4, review of the resident's Weekly Skin Sheets showed the resident's wound on 10/4/21 measured 4.3 centimeters (cm) x 2.4 cm, and no depth, with inflammation, redness, and possible infection. On 10/11/21, the wound measured 8.0 cm x 4.0 cm and a depth of 0.5 cm. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Sep 13, 2021
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 4 sampled (Resident #1) for elopement. On 8/7/21 at 2:00 p.m., Resident #1 who had cognitive impairment eloped from the facility without staff knowledge. The staff reported the alarms failed to sound. The facility failed to fully repair a door alarm known to not function prior to the elopement. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate the root cause of the elopement. The failures resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the residents. The facility reported 5 resident had cognitive impairments and independently mobile. The facility reported a census of 50 residents. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 3, 2024
Based on observation, interview, facility investigation review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a severely cognitively impaired resident identified at risk for elopement, with wandering behaviors free from elopement on 4/30/24. The resident went through a set of double doors into a common area by the beauty salon, went through a door into the unoccupied assisted living portion of the facility when the keypad was disengaged, and exited through a third door present on the unoccupied assisted living portion of the facility which lead directly to the outside of the facility. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Sep 7, 2023
Based on observation, interviews, clinical record review, and hospital record review the facility failed to ensure residents are provided assessments and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when they failed to consistently, properly assess, and document changes in condition for a resident who had required immediate transfer to a hospital for septic shock. Also, the facility failed to consistently follow the following physician's order for another resident with a known history of Congestive Heart Failure; weigh resident daily and notify the physician for a three-pound weight gain. The facility staff did not consistently assess this resident or document for this resident with the weight gains. The resident had frequent hospitalization s as a result of fluid overload. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 7, 2023
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, facility investigation review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure safe transfer of a resident via Hoyer (mechanical) lift and failed to ensure a resident remained free from a preventable accident for two of four residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #37, Resident #39). On 3/12/23 the strap to the Hoyer sling ripped and Resident #39 fell approximately 3 feet during a Hoyer lift transfer. Resident #39's fall on 3/12/23 required transfer to the hospital. On 6/22/23 Resident #39 was lowered to the floor due to the Hoyer lift hydraulic breaking and the lift tipped. On 7/18/23, Resident #39 fell from the Hoyer when the sling broke. […]
Read 37 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 37 of 134 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 22, 2026Standard2 findings
- Apr 9, 2025Standard2 findings
- Nov 14, 2024Standard5 findings
- Jul 3, 2024Standard and complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 8, 2024Standard6 findings
- Sep 7, 2023Standard and complaint17 findings · 3 harm
- May 15, 2023Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 15, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 21 earlier surveys
- Mar 2, 2023Standard and complaint17 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 19, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Oct 5, 2022Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 4, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 3, 2022Complaint8 findings · 2 harm
- Nov 3, 2021Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 13, 2021Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 3, 2021Standard and complaint15 findings
- May 8, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings
- Aug 9, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Apr 24, 2018Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 9, 2018Standard1 finding
- Nov 10, 2016Standard2 findings
- Apr 25, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 10, 2015Standard4 findings
- Dec 4, 2014Standard1 finding
- Sep 19, 2013—6 findings
- Oct 15, 2012—1 finding
- Aug 9, 2012—1 finding
- Jun 23, 2011—9 findings
- Apr 18, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction