Windmere
North Haledon, New Jersey · CCN 315531
2 surveys since 2024, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 5
- Surveys
- 2
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Across 2 surveys carrying at least one finding.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 57
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Passaic
- Medicare-certified since
- 2024
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- —
- Quality measures
- —
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Mar 3, 2026
251 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D120.0% | E— | F480.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Windmere, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF640Mar 3, 2026
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit Minimum Data Sets (MDS) in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 17 of 17 residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 20, and 21). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 2/25/26 at 1:06 PM, the surveyor reviewed the MDS submissions for Resident #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 20, 21. The MDS's were completed yet they were not submitted/transmitted to CMS as required. The facility had submitted the MDS' exclusively as state-only assessments and did not the MDS's. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 3, 2026
Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to sanitize and air dry steam table pans in a manner to prevent microbial growth. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 2/26/26 at 10:32 AM, in the presence of the Executive Sous Chef (ESC) and the Senior Director of Dining and Nutrition Services (DNS), the surveyor observed the following:On a shelf, in the area of the dishwashing area, near the 3 compartment sink, the surveyor observed 4 deep full sheet sized steam table pans, stacked with water between them, 5 deep half sized steam table pans stacked with water between them, and 2 shallow full size steam table pans stacked with water between them. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF881Aug 8, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: a) the Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) Policy and Procedure, part of the facility Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP) was reviewed at least annually and included a procedure for the reporting of multidrug- resistant organisms (MDRO), and communicable diseases to local/state public health authorities, b) a standardized infection assessment tool or management algorithm (IST) was consistently utilized for prescribed antibiotics (Resident #2), c) residents with chronic urinary tract infection with multiple prescribed antibiotics were tracked to prevent development and/or transmission of MDRO, d) staff were educated when a Multidrug-Resistant… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF940Aug 8, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all licensed staff received training and competencies in accordance with the Facility Assessment, and to ensure facility policies and procedures for wound care competencies were met. This deficient practice was identified during an Initial Certification Survey for 1 of 7 Residents sampled for wound care (Resident #1) and one closed medical record (Resident #2). The deficient practice effected 2 of 2 Resident Units and was evidenced by the following: On 08/07/24 at 9:09 AM, during the facility entrance conference the surveyors requested a list of all the residents who received wound care. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF836Mar 3, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to notify CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) and receive authorization for a change in facility name in accordance with 42 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 424.516. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:According to 42 CFR 424.516 Additional provider and supplier requirements for enrolling and maintaining active enrollment status in the Medicare Program:(a) Certifying compliance. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 3, 2026Standard3 findings
- Aug 8, 2024Standard2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care at EvergreensMoorestownno harm findings
- Childrens Specialized Hospital Toms RiverToms Riverno harm findings
- Medford LeasMedfordno harm findings
- Childrens Specialized Hospital MountainsideMountainsideno harm findings
- Lutheran Social Ministries Cranes MillWest Caldwell1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction