Deficiency Index

Willowbrooke Court SKD Care Center at Lima Estates

Lima, Pennsylvania · CCN 395492

10 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
55
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2022
’11’15’20’22
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
ACTS RETIREMENT-LIFE COMMUNITIES
County
Delaware
Medicare-certified since
1981

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

—

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.114.80
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.46—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Willowbrooke Court SKD Care Center at Lima Estates, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Jun 10, 2022

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident 35). Findings include: Review of Resident 35's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated January 5, 2022, for [MEDICATION(S)] (narcotic pain reliever) Patch 72 Hour 12 micrograms/hour - Apply 1 patch transdermally (to the skin) every 72 hours for pain and remove per schedule and an order dated August 4, 2021, to check the placement of the patch every shift. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Jun 10, 2022

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure two of 13 residents reviewed received adequate supervision resulting in an elopement and a fall during a transfer using a lift (Residents 33 and 35). Findings include: Review of facility policy Elopement/Wandering Risk Assessment reviewed June 13, 2022, revealed that When responding to an alarm, if it cannot be determined what triggered the alarm, immediately verify that every resident is safe and accounted for by conducting a visual head and name reconciliation Review of Resident 33 progress notes dated June 1, 2021, at 11:46 p.m. revealed Approx. 7 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF610May 13, 2021

    Based on a review of clinical records and facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse and injury of unknown origin for three of 14 residents reviewed (Closed Record Residents CL1, CL2, and Resident 12) Finding include: A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, Involuntary Seclusion, Exploitation, and Misappropriation of Property Prevention, with a revision date of October 2019, revealed that the executive director, administrator, or designee will immediately initiate an investigation of the alleged incident and include the following: Type of allegation being reported; Resident's description of the abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation, or misappropriation of property;… […]

  • No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadF730May 13, 2021

    Based on a review of employee personnel records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance reviews for five of five Nurse Aides reviewed (Employee E4, E5, E6, E7 and E8). Findings include: A list of Nurse Aides provided by the facility for review failed to reveal that the following employees had an annual performance review completed by the facility: Employee E4 (Date of Hire-March 11. 2019), Employee E5 (Date of Hire - November 22, 2011), Employee E6 (Date of Hire- June 14, 2016), and Employee E7 (Date of Hire-April 19, 2011), and Employee E8 (Date of Hire-February 11, 1988) An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on May 12, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 55 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 10, 2022Standard2 findings
  • May 13, 2021Standard2 findings
  • May 31, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Aug 1, 2017Standard12 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 5, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • May 6, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Jun 1, 2015Standard6 findings
  • May 31, 2013—4 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Jun 14, 2012—3 findings
  • Jul 18, 2011—13 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction