Deficiency Index

Frederick Living - Cedarwood

Frederick, Pennsylvania · CCN 395656

10 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
21
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
61
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Montgomery
Medicare-certified since
1984

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Oct 26, 2023

1,110 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.804.80
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.69—
Annual nurse turnover39.5%31.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 1 of the 21 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Frederick Living - Cedarwood, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF676Aug 13, 2026

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve the ability to carry out certain activities of daily living that included mobility and walking for one of five sampled residents who had limitations in carrying out activities of daily living. (Resident 8)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 8 had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, dementia, restless leg syndrome, and an abnormal gait. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had some memory impairment and had limitations in range of motion in both upper and lower extremities. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Oct 26, 2023

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician's order was implemented for three of 12 sampled residents. (Residents 22, 23, 30) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that the physician directed staff to administer the following bowel protocol for Residents 22, 23, and 30: staff was to administer prune juice on day shift (7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.) if the resident had no bowel movement (BM) in 72 hours. If prune juice was ineffective, staff was to administer milk of magnesia 24 hours later on evening shift (3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.). If milk of magnesia was ineffective, a bisacodyl suppository was to be administered on night shift (11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Nov 4, 2021

    Based on a confidential group interview, it was determined that the facility failed to administer vaccinations in a dignified manner to two of four residents at resident council. Findings include: During a confidential group interview on November 3, 2021, at 10:30 a.m., two residents stated that during the month of October 2021, the pharmacist entered the facility during lunch to administer the booster vaccine to all the residents. The residents stated, We felt like we were rounded up like cattle during our meal time to receive a booster vaccine. The residents stated that there was no privacy provided and that they were afraid to express their feelings about the situation. The residents felt the situation could have been handled in a more dignified manner. 28. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Nov 4, 2021

    Based on clinical record review, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that safety interventions were implemented and in place for one of 16 sampled residents. (Resident 42) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 42 had diagnoses that included abnormalities of gait and mobility and history of falling. The current care plan identified that the resident was at risk to fall related to gait balance problems, poor safety awareness, history of falls, anxiety, and wandering. On September 6, 2021, Resident 42 fell in the dining room. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF697Nov 4, 2021

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pain management included the attempt to provide non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to or in conjunction with the administration of pain mediation prescribed on an as needed basis for three of 16 sampled residents. (Residents 22, 28, 43) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 22 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The resident had a physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the Medication Administration Record [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 21 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 13, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Oct 26, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Nov 4, 2021Standard3 findings
  • Nov 13, 2020Standard2 findings
  • Jul 18, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Jun 15, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Aug 2, 2013—2 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Jul 3, 2012—3 findings
  • Aug 5, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction