Deficiency Index

Willowbrook Rehabilitation and Care

Yadkinville, North Carolina · CCN 345466

15 surveys since 2010, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
56
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
76
Ownership
For profit - Partnership
Chain
AVARDIS HEALTH
County
Yadkin
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 12, 2025

423 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.143.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.29—
Annual nurse turnover32.7%51.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD466.7%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B233.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 56 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Willowbrook Rehabilitation and Care, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Sep 12, 2025

    Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #76) attended his doctor appointment when Resident #76 missed a scheduled orthopedic appointment on 9/12/24 to have stitches removed due to facility failure to transcribe the order resulting in a missed doctor appointment. The findings included:Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including displaced subtrochanteric fracture of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing and anxiety.Resident # was discharged from the facility on 9/20/24. During an interview with Unit Manager #1 on 9/11/25 at 12:03 p.m. she revealed that Resident #76 missed his appointment to have his stiches removed on 9/12/24. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF759Sep 12, 2025

    Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a medication error rate of less than 5% as evidenced by 2 medication errors out of 31 medication administration opportunities resulting in a medication error rate 6.45% for 2 of 6 residents observed during medication pass (Resident #3 and Resident #41).The findings included:1.Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included glaucoma.A review of Resident #3's active physician orders dated 7/3/25 included a current order for Dorzolamide HCL-Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 2-0.5% (a combination medication used to lower intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma) one (1) drop to right eye twice a day. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Aug 2, 2023

    Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan that addressed discharge goals and plans for 2 of 17 residents (Residents #1 and #55) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings included: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed an active discharge plan was in place for the resident to return to the community. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 was cognitively intact. The comprehensive care plan, updated 7/14/23, did not include information that addressed discharge plans or goals. In an interview with Resident #1 on 8/1/23 at 2:36 PM, he shared his discharge plan was to remain in the facility for long term care. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Aug 2, 2023

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure medicated treatments left in an unattended treatment cart for 1 of 1 treatment cart. The findings included: During wound care observation on 8/1/23 at 10:53 AM, Nurse #1 was observed to push the treatment cart against the wall on the 200 hall and entered a resident room and closed the door to perform wound care. The cart lock was not pushed in indicating a locked position. Observation of Treatment Cart #1 revealed the top drawer to contain topical ointments. The second drawer contained medicated dressings and bandages. […]

  • No harm, potential for minimal, patternF623Aug 2, 2023

    Based on resident and staff interviews, interview with the Ombudsman and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the resident a written notification for the reason for transfer to the hospital and failed to provide a copy of the transfer/discharge notice to the Ombudsman for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #56 and Resident #58) reviewed for hospitalization . Findings included: 1. Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was listed in the electronic health record as his own responsible party. The medical record demonstrated the resident was transferred to the hospital on 6/28/23 due to a change in condition. Resident #56 returned to the facility on [DATE]. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 56 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 12, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Aug 2, 2023Standard4 findings
  • Mar 17, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Dec 21, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 30, 2020Standard4 findings
  • Jan 25, 2019Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jan 5, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Nov 17, 2016Standard2 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Mar 25, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2015Standard9 findings
  • Sep 30, 2014Complaint5 findings
  • Sep 12, 2013—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 19, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 31, 2012—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 11, 2010—13 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction