Deficiency Index

Bethesda Health Care Facility

Eastover, North Carolina · CCN 345212

10 surveys since 2012, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
23
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2026
’12’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
85
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Cumberland
Medicare-certified since
1981

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Feb 12, 2026

270 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.183.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.41—
Annual nurse turnover40.6%51.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 23 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bethesda Health Care Facility, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Feb 12, 2026

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the areas of diabetes and anxiety diagnoses for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident #5).Findings include:Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Her medical history was significant for type 2 diabetes mellitus and generalized anxiety disorder.Resident #5's care plan created 1/10/25 indicated Resident #5 had a diagnosis of diabetes. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Feb 12, 2026

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a request for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation for a resident with serious mental health diagnoses for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR (Resident #4). Findings included:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension, hyperkalemia and hyperlipidemia. The PASRR history report dated 11/01/2021, provided by the facility, revealed Resident #4 had one Level I PASRR review, completed on 11/01/2021 and the review did not meet level II criteria. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF812Feb 12, 2026

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to discard expired food items and food items with signs of spoilage and failed to label and date resident's personal food items stored in 2 of 2 nourishment room refrigerators (Main Unit and Locked Unit). This practice had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses.Findings included:a. Observation of the Main Unit nourishment room refrigerator with the facility's Dietary Manager (DM) on 2/11/26 at 2:05 PM revealed the following: - A jar of strawberry preserves that was approximately a third full with a use by date of 1/19/26; - An unopened 8 ounces bottle of high protein milkshake with a best if used by date of 1/30/26; - Three unopened bottles of nutritional energy drink with a use by date of 10/9/25; - A 2-liter soft drink… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF582Nov 1, 2024

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the required Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) (form 10123) for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification review (Resident #49). The findings included: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Medicare Part A skilled services. Resident #49's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #49's Medicare Part A skilled services ended on 4/08/2024 and her Medicare Part A Skilled Nursing Facility benefit was not exhausted. She remained in the facility. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 23 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 12, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Nov 1, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Feb 1, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Apr 5, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Jun 14, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Aug 25, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Sep 24, 2015Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Aug 6, 2014Standard1 finding
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Sep 12, 2013—5 findings
  • Aug 15, 2012—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction