Deficiency Index

White Sulphur Springs Center

White Sulphur Spring, West Virginia · CCN 515100

17 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
186
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
7
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy7

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
68
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
GENESIS HEALTHCARE
County
Greenbrier · rural
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 28 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in West Virginia.

Last survey on record

Nov 19, 2025

355 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.103.35
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.85—
Annual nurse turnover23.4%47.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$59,233 across 4 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ36.7%K12.2%L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2146.7%E1635.6%F36.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B12.2%C—
CMS’s current file: 45 of the 186 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6442×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F9212×

    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at White Sulphur Springs Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF805Sep 10, 2025

    Based on record review, staff interview and observations, the facility failed to ensure residents were served food in the correct consistency according to the facility's diet description for puree consistency solids. It was determined that this failed practice placed all (5) five residents currently on a puree diet in an immediate jeopardy situation. Providing a resident with the wrong consistency of food could result in choking, and/or aspiration pneumonia which can lead to serious harm and/or death. This failed practice was found to be true for five (5) of five (5) residents reviewed for diet consistency during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: #12, #21, #33, #38, and #53. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jul 11, 2024

    Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure its residents were not abused. The facility failed to provide services to residents that were necessary to avoid mental or emotional harm. In addition, the facility failed to protect residents when verbal and physical threats were made. This was true for 1 (one) of 1 (one) resident reviewed during the Long-Term Survey Process. Facility census: 64. Resident identifier #42, and #61. This created an immediate jeopardy situation. Findings include: a) Resident #42 On 07/08/24 at 1:30 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #42. At that time, Resident #42 stated, I don't sleep much at night due to Resident #61 coming into my room at night. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Jul 11, 2024

    ]Based on medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow up on physician's recommendations for a biopsy of Resident #29 thyroid nodules upon readmission to the facility on [DATE]. This was true for one (1) of nineteen (19) residents care reviewed during the long-term care survey process. This created a situation of immediate jeopardy. Resident identifier: Resident #29. Census: 64. Finding included: a) Resident #29 No documentation in the chart of surrogate being notified of the hospitals recommendations to refer to and ENT (Ear Nose and Throat) for a possible biopsy of thyroid nodules. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 11, 2024

    Based on Record review and family and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a safe environment to prevent elopement, resulting in Resident #120 leaving the facility and being found outside the facility, deceased . The facility ' s failure to ensure residents did not exit the facility unattended on [DATE] placed all at risk residents who could have exited the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation.This will be cited at past noncompliance because the facility corrected the failure as of [DATE], prior to this survey. This was true for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for accidents and one (1) of three (3) reviewed for elopement during the survey process.Resident Identifier: 120. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Jul 11, 2024

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to employ qualified dietary staff, due to letting employees work in the dietary department before obtaining food handler permits. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 64. Findings include: a) At approximately 10:00 AM on 07/09/2024, food handler permits were requested from the Dining Services Account Manager (DSAM). The DSAM made copies of the ones on file in the dietary office and stated, I'll have to find the others. At approximately 1:30 PM the DSAM stated they were still waiting on a couple food handlers cards. On 07/10/2024, the DSAM supplied a copy of a food handler permit for [NAME] #59, with an issue date of 07/10/2024. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 186 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 10, 2025Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 11, 2024Standard and complaint24 findings · 3 harm
  • Mar 8, 2023Standard11 findings
  • Dec 1, 2021Standard9 findings
  • Oct 8, 2020Standard13 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 19, 2019Complaint7 findings
  • Feb 14, 2019Standard16 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Feb 22, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Dec 15, 2016Standard23 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 30, 2015Standard16 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 25, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Mar 13, 2013—14 findings
  • Jul 26, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 16, 2011—8 findings
  • Jul 22, 2011—2 findings
  • May 19, 2011Standard19 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction