White Blossom Care Center
San Jose, California · CCN 555068
75 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 217
- Surveys
- 75
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 153
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PACS GROUP
- County
- Santa Clara
- Medicare-certified since
- 1977
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.
Last survey on record
May 12, 2026
181 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.03 | 4.08 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.54 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 54.3% | 37.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $97,052 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K12.0% | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3265.3% | E1224.5% | F36.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8805×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6844×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6893×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at White Blossom Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Feb 8, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe smoking environment and provide supervision for nine of nine residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) who smoked outside of the facility as evidenced by: 1.The facility failed to follow the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool for residents' functional status to help identify health problems and to identify the proper care needed) assessment to provide staff supervision and/or physical assistance for nine of nine residents (Residents 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9) when these nine residents left their rooms/units and went outside of the facility to smoke at the old smoking area, located at the corner of the facility near a major street and the facility's parking lot. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF627May 12, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate and safe discharge process for one of three residents (Resident 1) when:1. Failure to provide the Notice of Proposed Transfer/Discharge as soon as practicable before the discharge;2. Failure to assess and identify Resident 1's living situation; and3. Failure to coordinate and confirm home health services.These failures resulted in Resident 1 being discharged without a confirmed discharge destination and follow-up services, placing the resident at risk for unmet medical needs, interruption in care, and harm. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 13, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation during storing and preparing food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when:Three of three ice machines (one in kitchen, and two located in nursing station areas) were not clean.The strength of sanitizer used to sanitize a kitchen food preparation table was not an appropriate strength.A kitchen industrial can opener and its base were not clean.These failures had the potential to increase the risk of food contamination to the residents in the facility for 147 residents who ate food by mouth out of a facility census of 153.1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/10/26 at 10:03 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF813Mar 13, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure regarding foods brought to residents by family and visitors when the facility did not educate family and visitors to prepare and transport food using safe handling practices outlined in the policy and procedure. This failure increased the risk of family members bringing contaminated food to residents leading to food born illness for 147 who ate food by mouth out of a census of 153.Review of the undated policy and procedure titled Foods Brought by Family/Visitors, showed family/visitors are asked to prepare and transport food using safe food handling practices, including: safe cooling and reheating processes, holding temperatures, preventing cross-contamination with raw or… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF921Mar 13, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment for residents and staff when:Cloth straps used to hold ice chests were not clean.The floor around a metal cabinet in the kitchen was not clean, and the floor in the kitchen walk-in freezer was not clean.A kitchen's air conditioner surface was not clean.A large portion of paint was detached from the wall surface in the kitchen.The baseboard around the kitchen trayline table in the kitchen was broken and cracked.The vent in the kitchen's chemical room was not clean.There was no air gap for the kitchen food preparation sink drain.These failures had the potential to provide harborage for pests and/or contaminate equipment leading to contamination of food for 147 residents out of a census of… […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 217 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 12, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 13, 2026Standard15 findings
- Mar 11, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 10, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 21, 2024Standard2 findings
- Oct 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Aug 29, 2024Complaint2 findings
Show the 67 earlier surveys
- Aug 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 25, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jun 12, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jun 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 8, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Dec 5, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 23, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 25, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Dec 14, 2022Complaint4 findings
- Aug 29, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Feb 15, 2022Standard16 findings
- Sep 10, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Apr 15, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Mar 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 11, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Oct 5, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jul 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 11, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Nov 27, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Oct 10, 2019Standard16 findings
- Oct 3, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Aug 1, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Apr 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Feb 22, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jan 22, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jan 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 21, 2018Standard17 findings
- May 29, 2018Complaint1 finding
- May 23, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 22, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Feb 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Dec 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Dec 13, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Sep 21, 2017Standard3 findings
- Jul 14, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jun 27, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Dec 22, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Oct 26, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Sep 30, 2016Standard and complaint7 findings
- Feb 22, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Jan 11, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 4, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Oct 22, 2015Standard and complaint14 findings
- Apr 9, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Dec 12, 2014Standard5 findings
- Jul 18, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jun 25, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Feb 5, 2014Standard and complaint15 findings
- Apr 30, 2013—3 findings
- Feb 26, 2013—1 finding
- Feb 6, 2013—2 findings
- Jan 31, 2013—7 findings
- Aug 31, 2012—2 findings
- Aug 27, 2012—2 findings
- Aug 9, 2012—2 findings
- May 23, 2012—1 finding
- Apr 19, 2012—6 findings
- Apr 11, 2012—1 finding
- Mar 19, 2012—1 finding
- Feb 24, 2012—1 finding
- Nov 16, 2011—1 finding
- Sep 23, 2011—1 finding
- Sep 15, 2011—3 findings · 1 harm
- May 13, 2011—7 findings
- Apr 7, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction