Deficiency Index

Panorama Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Panorama City, California · CCN 056337

41 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
171
Surveys
41
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/41

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
151
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
THE ENSIGN GROUP
County
Los Angeles
Medicare-certified since
1973

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jul 24, 2026

108 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.874.08
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.34—
Annual nurse turnover33.5%37.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$28,369 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ11.7%K—L—
Actual harmG23.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4170.7%E1322.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B11.7%C—
CMS’s current file: 58 of the 171 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6565×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6773×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6863×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Panorama Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Jun 12, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) was kept free from significant medication error (the administration of medication, or omission of a medication that endangers the health and safety of a resident), when on 5/30/2024, Student Nurse 1 (STU 1) administered medications to Resident 1 that were intended for a different resident (Resident 2). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 receiving three (3) medications that were intended for Resident 2 and placed Resident 1 at increased risk of severe health complications including hallucinations (false perception; the experience of seeing, hearing, feeling, or smelling something that does not exist), mood changes (such as agitation [feeling of irritability or… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Aug 28, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 69 and Resident 13), who were investigated under the pressure ulcer (PU - damage to an area of the skin caused by prolonged pressure or friction, often over bony areas like the tailbone, heels or elbows) care area, received care consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to: 1. Prevent the worsening of a Stage Two (2) (an open, shallow wound that has damaged the epidermis [top layer of the skin] and the dermis [middle layer of the skin], with the fluid-filled blister appearing as a ruptured or intact blister containing fluid) fluid-filled blister (a painful skin condition where fluid fills a space between layers of skin) on Resident 69's left heel,… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF688Aug 28, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain range of motion (ROM- full movement potential of a joint) and mobility (ability to move) for two of four sampled residents (Resident 13 and Resident 69) reviewed under the Position/Mobility care area by failing to: 1. Provide Resident 13 with ROM exercises to both arms and legs following the identification of ROM limitations on the initial Joint Mobility Evaluation (JME- brief assessment of a resident's ROM in each joint of both arms and legs), dated 3/18/2025. 2. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600May 6, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse (deliberately aggressive or violent behavior with the intention to cause harm) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) when on 4/23/2025 Resident 1 used his (Resident 1) right hand to graze (a skin injury to the outer layers of the skin) Resident 2's left cheek. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 being subjected to physical abuse by Resident 1 while under the care of the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Jun 12, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the needed resident-centered (an approach that puts the individual's needs, preferences and well-being at the heart of their care plan) care and services for three of four sampled residents (Resident 1, 3, and 4) by failing to: 1. Implement the facility's significant change in condition policy by not having documented evidence that a change in resident's condition was completed when a skin discoloration was identified on 5/23/2026 for Resident 1. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk of not receiving appropriate care due to inaccurate and incomplete resident medical care information. 2. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 171 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 13, 2026Standard6 findings
  • Jul 24, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 12, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 3, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • May 29, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2025Standard and complaint16 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 17, 2025Complaint2 findings
Show the 33 earlier surveys
  • May 6, 2025Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 24, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 29, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Aug 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 12, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 12, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 11, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 2, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 9, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 27, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 30, 2021Standard12 findings
  • Jan 15, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 23, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 12, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 26, 2019Standard11 findings
  • Jul 26, 2018Standard18 findings
  • Jul 28, 2017Standard18 findings
  • Oct 6, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 15, 2016Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 20, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Apr 15, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 24, 2013—11 findings
  • Apr 10, 2012—13 findings
  • May 24, 2011—1 finding
  • Jan 14, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction