Deficiency Index

Whispering Springs Rehabilitation and Healthcare C

Carrizo Springs, Texas · CCN 675373

23 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
75
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
NEXION HEALTH
County
Dimmit · rural
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 28, 2026

104 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.693.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.48—
Annual nurse turnover32.5%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD571.4%E114.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C114.3%
CMS’s current file: 7 of the 75 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Whispering Springs Rehabilitation and Healthcare C, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 6, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure partial loaf with over half of loaf used was dated with the opened date. 2. The facility failed to ensure opened bagged elbow pasta was dated with the opened date. 3. The facility failed to ensure twenty-five-pound opened bag of corn meal was sealed and dated with opened date. 4. The facility failed to ensure staff with facial hair was covered by a hair restraint. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation on [DATE] at 11:20 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Jul 28, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 11 (Resident #1) residents whose records were reviewed for assessments. The facility nursing staff failed to code Resident #1 had recent fall with injury on her MDS assessment. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not identifying care areas and result in residents not receiving needed care and services.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 09/22/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 was not listed as her own responsible party with her [family member] listed as Emergency Contact #1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Jul 28, 2026

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 11 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for care plans. The facility nursing staff failed to revise Resident #1's care plan with a fall with injury requiring hospital admission on [DATE] and fall interventions following significant change of condition. This failure could have placed residents at risk of not having their needs identified and met. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Jun 5, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident use hot water was reliably controlled, by thermostatic or mixing valves, and did not exceed 110 degrees Fahrenheit and not less than 100 degrees Fahrenheit at each fixture for 4 of 4 shower rooms (Hall 1, 2, 3, and 4) reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure the Hall 1 shower temperature did not exceed 110 F and read 116.2 F.2. The facility failed to ensure the Hall 2 shower temperature did not exceed 110 F and read 112.2 F.3. The facility failed to ensure the Hall 3 shower temperature was not less than 100 F and read 89.4 F.4. The facility failed to ensure the Hall 4 shower temperature did not exceed 110 F and read 114.4 F. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842May 5, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible and systematically organized for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for accuracy of medical records, in that: The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for Resident #20's code status. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records were maintained by the facility and place them at risk for errors in care and treatment. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 75 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 28, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 18, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Jun 6, 2024Standard1 finding
  • May 5, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Jun 22, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 24, 2022Standard3 findings
  • Oct 25, 2019Standard13 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • May 23, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 5, 2018Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Apr 3, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 29, 2017Standard4 findings
  • May 17, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 12, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Aug 3, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 22, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 8, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 11, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Sep 12, 2014Standard9 findings
  • Jul 19, 2013—2 findings
  • Aug 24, 2012—1 finding
  • May 18, 2012—5 findings
  • Jun 8, 2011—10 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction