Deficiency Index

Westgate Gardens Care Center

Visalia, California · CCN 555208

69 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
203
Surveys
69
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse9

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file44/69

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
140
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
PACS GROUP
County
Tulare
Medicare-certified since
1985

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jul 27, 2026

105 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.134.08
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.32—
Annual nurse turnover45.3%37.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$10,317 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG11.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4480.0%E916.4%F11.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 55 of the 203 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6565×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5803×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Westgate Gardens Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 4, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff used the Hoyer lift (mechanical device designed to assist individuals with limited mobility in safely transferring from one place to another) properly when the legs (base) of the Hoyer lift were not open during a transfer for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in the Hoyer lift tilting over causing Resident 1 to fall to the floor, sustaining a mild displaced (bone fragments are no longer together) distal (away from the point of attachment) coccygeal (tailbone) segment (completely detached from surrounding bone) fracture (break in a bone).Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) dated 6/10/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 24, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four shower beds (a medical device used to transport and shower people who are unable to stand or sit in a chair) was in a safe and operable manner for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted with one shower bed having a missing part which resulted in the shower bed collapsing while in use, Resident 1 falling from the shower bed, hitting her head on the shower wall, and the potential for significant injury. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 15, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired foods were not available to be served when there was molded Hawaiian rolls and expired rice vinegar in the dry food storage area. This had the potential to be served to the residents and cause food borne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on [DATE], at 8:28 a.m., with Director of Dietary Services (DDS), in the kitchen dry storage room, the bread storage area contained two packages of Hawaiian rolls. Each package contained 12 Hawaiian rolls for a total of 24 Hawaiian rolls. Out of 24 Hawaiian rolls approximately 18 had mold on them. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Feb 24, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (AD-a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) were offered and completed for two of 32 sampled residents (Resident 19 and Resident 103). This failure had the potential for residents' healthcare wishes to not be honored. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/20/25 at 9:25 a.m. with Nursing Consultant (NC), NC was unable to provide documentation of an AD for Resident 19. NC stated there is no AD on file or no documentation of AD being offered or discussed with Resident 19 or Resident 19's responsible party. 51320 During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/24/25 at 11:28 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF847Feb 24, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its arbitration agreement explicitly indicated that the resident or his or her representative had the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing the arbitration agreement. This failure had the potential for 92 of 138 residents who signed arbitration agreements not to understand their right to rescind the arbitration agreement within 30 days. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/24/25 at 9:30 a.m. with the Admissions Director (AD), the facility's list of current residents who signed arbitration agreements was reviewed. A review of the list of current residents who signed arbitration agreements indicated 92 of 138 residents had signed it. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 203 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 28, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 17, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 22, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 1, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 11, 2025Complaint2 findings
Show the 61 earlier surveys
  • Jun 4, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 7, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 24, 2025Standard9 findings
  • Jan 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 23, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 29, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 21, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 31, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 16, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2023Standard15 findings
  • Apr 17, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 2, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 1, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 7, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 27, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • May 24, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 19, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 22, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 24, 2019Standard6 findings
  • May 30, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 24, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 25, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 15, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 4, 2018Standard14 findings
  • Mar 29, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2017Standard9 findings
  • Nov 8, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 4, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 17, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 8, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 23, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 6, 2016Standard14 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 12, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 5, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 14, 2016Standard17 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 11, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 15, 2015Standard14 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 15, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 26, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 6, 2014—7 findings
  • Jun 25, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2013Standard17 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 19, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 29, 2012—7 findings
  • Mar 25, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction