Deficiency Index

Watertown Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Watertown, Massachusetts · CCN 225425

36 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
201
Surveys
36
Harm or worse
13
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file25/36

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
163
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
EPHRAM LAHASKY
County
Middlesex
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Apr 28, 2026

195 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.303.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.47—
Annual nurse turnover30.2%34.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$56,440 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG11.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD5371.6%E1621.6%F34.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B11.4%C—
CMS’s current file: 74 of the 201 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7615×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F6774×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F8424×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Watertown Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Feb 3, 2021

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of seven sampled residents (Resident #3), who was a Full Code (attempt resuscitation), the Facility failed to ensure staff immediately activated their emergency code protocol (code blue), when he/she was found unresponsive. On [DATE], Nurse #1 found Resident #3 unresponsive, failed to call a code blue, initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and activate 911, because when he checked the medical record to determine his/her code status, there was a photocopy of a Medical Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form that indicated a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status, however, that form belonged to another resident (Resident #6) with the same first and last name as Resident #3, that had been placed in Resident #3's medical record in… […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF842Feb 3, 2021

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of seven sampled residents (Resident #3), who was a Full Code (attempt resuscitation), the Facility failed to ensure policies and procedures were developed, implemented, and staff were trained to ensure a complete and accurate medical record was maintained with residents that have the same or similar names to ensure their advanced directives were followed in accordance with their physician's orders [REDACTED].>On [DATE], Nurse #1 found Resident #3 unresponsive, went to Resident #3's medical record, noted a white photocopy of a Medical Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form that indicated he/she was a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), however, that form was Resident #6's MOLST form, who had the same first and last name as Resident #3. […]

  • Actual harm, patternF692May 31, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility 1. failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition for 3 of 6 sampled Residents (#57, #98 and #161) receiving tube feedings (TF), and 2. failed to identify a significant weight loss for 1 Resident not receiving tube feeding (#52) out of a total of 30 sampled Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's Weighing and Measuring the Resident policy, dated March 2011 indicated: *The purpose of this procedure is to determine the resident's weight to provide a baseline and an ongoing record of the resident's body weight as an indicator of the nutritional status and medical condition of the resident. *Report significant weight loss/gain to the nurse supervisor. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Aug 28, 2024

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of seven sampled residents (Resident #3), who upon admission was assessed as being at high risk for skin breakdown and was documented by nursing to have intact skin, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received adequate care and services related to the prevention of the development and/or worsening of a pressure injury. On 8/02/24, Resident #3's weekly skin assessment indicated he/she had an area of impaired skin integrity on his/her buttocks that was un-measurable, however physician's orders for treatment were not obtained until 8/14/24, almost two weeks later. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686May 31, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a treatment in a timely manner for an existing pressure ulcer for 1 Resident (#161) out of a total of 36 sampled Residents. Findings include: Resident #161 was initially admitted to the facility in October 2021 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of his/her most recent Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #161 is severely cognitively impaired, is totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living, and receives nutrition through a feeding tube. Review of Resident #161's Norton Plus Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcers, dated 3/2/22 indicated he/she was at high risk for developing pressure ulcers. […]

Read 32 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 32 of 201 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 28, 2026Standard12 findings
  • Dec 3, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 6, 2025Standard16 findings
  • Nov 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2024Complaint9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 10, 2024Standard11 findings
Show the 28 earlier surveys
  • Apr 30, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 20, 2023Standard19 findings
  • Nov 10, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • May 31, 2022Standard20 findings · 3 harm
  • Apr 6, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 7, 2022Infection control4 findings
  • Jan 13, 2022Complaint7 findings · 4 harm
  • Dec 15, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 20, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 6, 2021Standard22 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 5, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 3, 2021Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 28, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 2, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 29, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 19, 2019Standard18 findings
  • Mar 29, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 21, 2018Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Jun 9, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 17, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Dec 23, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 4, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Aug 31, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 12, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Jul 23, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 3, 2013—4 findings
  • Jul 19, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction